Forum: Rails-core (closed, excessive spam) Should patches to Rails Trac tickets be against SVN or GIT?

Cf30dd551a68ff59f79a0e8c1aa8d492?d=identicon&s=25 David Harding (Guest)
on 2008-04-23 16:13
(Received via mailing list)
I noticed yesterday that a patch created against the svn repo that I
had submitted in Trac does not work against the latest Git checkout.
Should I grab the latest GIT and create my patch against that instead?

- david
81b61875e41eaa58887543635d556fca?d=identicon&s=25 Frederick Cheung (Guest)
on 2008-04-23 16:29
(Received via mailing list)
On 23 Apr 2008, at 15:11, David Harding wrote:

>
> I noticed yesterday that a patch created against the svn repo that I
> had submitted in Trac does not work against the latest Git checkout.
> Should I grab the latest GIT and create my patch against that instead?

Yup. svn isn't going anywhere.

Fred
Cf30dd551a68ff59f79a0e8c1aa8d492?d=identicon&s=25 David Harding (Guest)
on 2008-04-23 16:45
(Received via mailing list)
On Apr 23, 10:28 am, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > I noticed yesterday that a patch created against the svn repo that I
> > had submitted in Trac does not work against the latest Git checkout.
> > Should I grab the latest GIT and create my patch against that instead?
>
> Yup. svn isn't going anywhere.

http://dev.rubyonrails.org still says to create patches using svn. Are
there instructions somewhere on how you would like patches to be made
against the git repo?

- david
81b61875e41eaa58887543635d556fca?d=identicon&s=25 Frederick Cheung (Guest)
on 2008-04-23 17:02
(Received via mailing list)
On 23 Apr 2008, at 15:44, David Harding wrote:

>
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org still says to create patches using svn. Are
> there instructions somewhere on how you would like patches to be made
> against the git repo?
>
trac is also deprecated :-) http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/
see also http://www.tpope.net/rails-git-best-practices

Fred
D68c97e8e2f1653b54c24493caf236ae?d=identicon&s=25 Stephen Celis (Guest)
on 2008-04-23 18:57
(Received via mailing list)
Shouldn't the wiki get updated?

Stephen

On Apr 23, 10:01 am, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...@gmail.com>
Efa76b164a7de4a5730e4fa397cc4425?d=identicon&s=25 Michael Koziarski (Guest)
on 2008-04-23 23:30
(Received via mailing list)
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Stephen Celis <stephen.celis@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>  Shouldn't the wiki get updated?

Yes,  definitely.  I'll try to get something done over the next day or
so.

--
Cheers

Koz
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.