forgive my ignorance if this has already been discussed, but how much
overlap of communication is actually occurring here (among the
GNUradio / software defined radio / cognitive radio scene) with the
Open Spectrum movement vis-a-vis Larry Lessig, David P. Reed, et. al.?
http://www.greaterdemocracy.org/framing_openspectrum.html
http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2003/03/12/spectrum/index.html
http://www.reed.com/dprframeweb/dprframe.asp?section=openspec
http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/003708.shtml
On 7/26/07, Philip B. [email protected] wrote:
Some more takes on the FCC position.
My favorite is the second. The line “The Software Defined Radio (SDR)
Forum politely responded that the FCC did not know what it was doing
and asked it to get a clue.” amuses me.http://internetcommunications.tmcnet.com/topics/enterprise/
articles/8305-sflc-releases-white-paper-fcc-rules-software-defined.htm
http://reclaimthemedia.org/legislation_and_regulation/
fcc_doesnt_know_what_its_talki=5340
News and Advice on the World's Latest Innovations | ZDNET
2c62028023%2c00.htmPhilip
On 7/26/07, David Young [email protected] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:05:07PM -0700, John C. wrote:
, but because of the FCC’s paranoia (and other regulatory
agencies
around the world…),John,
Does any written statement from the FCC give credence to the
“regulatory
excuse” for keeping the Atheros HAL closed? Atheros cites the
FCC’s
SDR NPRM, which doesn’t really apply.Dave
–
David Young OJC Technologies
[email protected] Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933 ext 24