Recursive method not working

Hi, I’m trying to display a hierarchical tree but there’s something
wrong with the method below.
The result var is ‘lost’ between the calls - I mean, each “#{result}”
contains the right value at the end of the method (I checked that), but
that value is lost when returning to the upper level.

I don’t see why…

Thanks for your help !

def affiche_arbre(rubriques)
for rubrique in rubriques
result = ‘

0.step(rubrique.level) { result += ’ ‘}
result += rubrique.libelle + ’ ’ + link_to(’+’, :action => ‘new’,
:parent_id => rubrique) + ’ ’
unless rubrique.parent_id == nil
result += link_to(‘E’, :action => ‘edit’, :id => rubrique) + ’
’ + link_to(‘D’, :action => ‘delete’, :id => rubrique )
end
if rubrique.children.size > 0
result += affiche_arbre(rubrique.children)
end
end
“#{result}”
end

On 18.04.2007 18:01, Zouplaz wrote:

def affiche_arbre(rubriques)
I’d try to insert

result=""

here.

    result += affiche_arbre(rubrique.children)
  end
end
"#{result}"

Why do you do that? You could simply return result.

end

A general note: using << instead of += is much more efficient. You can
get even better by passing the result like this:

def meth(node, result="")

result << “START”

recursion

meth(another_node, result)

result << “END”

result
end

Kind regards

robert

On 4/18/07, Robert K. [email protected] wrote:

  0.step(rubrique.level) { result += '&nbsp;'}
"#{result}"

result << “START”
Kind regards

    robert

More remarks:

you should change

  result = '<br/>'

to
result << ‘

as well

now some enhacements:

for rubrique in rubriques

rubriques.each do |rubrique|
– it’s a question of style/taste otherwise equal

  unless rubrique.parent_id == nil

unless rubrique.parent_id.nil?

  if rubrique.children.size > 0

unless rubrique.children.empty?
– this one may be faster sometimes (if size computation is slow)
and it more explicitly shows what are you asking

  0.step(rubrique.level) { result += '&nbsp;'}

(rubrique.level + 1).times { result << ’ ‘}
or
result << (’ ’ * (rubrique.level +1))
– the first one is more descriptive, IMO

Jano

le 18/04/2007 21:18, Brian C. nous a dit:

Well, the only recursive call I can see is line 10. You append the return
values from these calls onto ‘result’. But then in line 12 you go back
around the loop, and in line 3 you reinitialise result, thereby throwing
away everything you’ve calculated so far.

You got it ! Thank you !

On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 01:05:05AM +0900, Zouplaz wrote:

Hi, I’m trying to display a hierarchical tree but there’s something
wrong with the method below.
The result var is ‘lost’ between the calls - I mean, each “#{result}”
contains the right value at the end of the method (I checked that), but
that value is lost when returning to the upper level.

I don’t see why…

Thanks for your help !

1> def affiche_arbre(rubriques)
2> for rubrique in rubriques
3> result = ‘

4> 0.step(rubrique.level) { result += ’ ‘}
5> result += rubrique.libelle + ’ ’ + link_to(’+’, :action =>
‘new’, :parent_id => rubrique) + ’ ’
6> unless rubrique.parent_id == nil
7> result += link_to(‘E’, :action => ‘edit’, :id => rubrique) +
’ ’ + link_to(‘D’, :action => ‘delete’, :id => rubrique )
8> end
9> if rubrique.children.size > 0
10> result += affiche_arbre(rubrique.children)
11> end
12> end
13> “#{result}”
14> end

Well, the only recursive call I can see is line 10. You append the
return
values from these calls onto ‘result’. But then in line 12 you go back
around the loop, and in line 3 you reinitialise result, thereby throwing
away everything you’ve calculated so far.

On Apr 18, 9:01 am, Zouplaz [email protected] wrote:

   if rubrique.children.size > 0
     result += affiche_arbre(rubrique.children)
   end
 end
 "#{result}"

end

This code could also be:
============ code ============
links(rubrique)
[ link_to(‘+’, :action => ‘new’, :parent_id => rubrique) ] +
( rubrique.parent_id ?
[ link_to(‘E’, :action => ‘edit’, :id => rubrique),
link_to(‘D’, :action => ‘delete’, :id => rubrique) ] : [ ] )
end

def affiche_arbre(rubriques)
rubriques.collect do |rubrique|

’ + (’ ’ * rubrique.level) +
[ rubrique.libelle ].concat(links(rubrique)).join(’ ') +
( rubrique.children.size.zero? ? ‘’ :
affiche_arbre(rubrique.children) )
end.join()
end
=========== /code ===============
Please excuse the Anglicized new function – I know no French. Notice
that this code allows you to test correctness of link generation
separately from correctness of the generated HTML. By restricting
myself to expressions – there are no variable assignments in this
code, let alone mutations – I protect myself from the kind of bug
that marred the original.