on 2007-03-10 02:57
on 2007-03-10 05:30
On Mar 9, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Lone Star Software wrote: > See the blog post at http://blog.lonestarsoftware.net/2007/03/09/ > active_resources-010-released/ Would it maybe be better to come up with a different name to avoid confusion with ActiveResource ? James. 1: http://svn.rubyonrails.org/rails/trunk/activeresource/ -- James Stewart Play: http://james.anthropiccollective.org Work: http://jystewart.net/process/
on 2007-03-10 06:55
Thanks for letting me know about that. I should have done more research before settling on a name. However, that project and this one definitely share some common goals. Perhaps one day, it'll all blend together. For now, let me think about what can be done... Tony
on 2007-03-10 19:58
On 3/9/07, Lone Star Software <email@example.com> wrote: > > Thanks for letting me know about that. I should have done more > research before settling on a name. However, that project and this one > definitely share some common goals. Perhaps one day, it'll all blend > together. For now, let me think about what can be done... > > Tony Actually they're completely different, ActiveResource is for consuming the very restful resources you're exposing. -- Rick Olson http://lighthouseapp.com http://weblog.techno-weenie.net http://mephistoblog.com
on 2007-03-10 23:14
I saw that you have also released mock active record. What is the need for mocking ActiveRecord objects?
on 2007-03-12 00:58
I use that for my test suite in active_record. I don't want to actually create a DB in order to test that the routes are generated correctly.
on 2007-03-12 01:00