# ZenTest 3.4.0 Released

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/zentest-3-4-0-released/68502>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [September 13, 2006, 6:36am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/zentest-3-4-0-released/68502 "2006-09-13T06:36:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2006, 6:36am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/zentest-3-4-0-released/68502/1 "2006-09-13T06:36:21Z")

</div>

ZenTest version 3.4.0 has been released!

[http://www.zenspider.com/ZSS/Products/ZenTest/](http://www.zenspider.com/ZSS/Products/ZenTest/)

== DESCRIPTION

ZenTest provides 4 different tools and 1 library: zentest, unit\_diff,  
autotest, multiruby, and Test::Rails.

ZenTest scans your target and unit-test code and writes your missing  
code based on simple naming rules, enabling XP at a much quicker  
pace. ZenTest only works with Ruby and Test::Unit.

unit\_diff is a command-line filter to diff expected results from  
actual results and allow you to quickly see exactly what is wrong.

autotest is a continous testing facility meant to be used during  
development. As soon as you save a file, autotest will run the  
corresponding dependent tests.

multiruby runs anything you want on multiple versions of ruby. Great  
for compatibility checking!

Test::Rails helps you build industrial-strength Rails code.

== FEATURES

- Scans your ruby code and tests and generates missing methods for you.

- Includes a very helpful filter for Test::Unit output called unit\_diff.

- Continually and intelligently test only those files you change with  
autotest.

- Test against multiple versions with multiruby.

- Enhance and automatically audit your rails tests using Test::Rails.

- Includes a LinuxJournal article on testing with ZenTest written by  
Pat Eyler.

- See also: [http://blog.zenspider.com/archives/zentest/](http://blog.zenspider.com/archives/zentest/)

- See also: [http://blog.segment7.net/articles/category/zentest](http://blog.segment7.net/articles/category/zentest)

Changes:

- 13 minor enhancements:

- 5 bug fixes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2006, 3:39pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/zentest-3-4-0-released/68502/2 "2006-09-13T15:39:21Z")

</div>

On 13/09/06, Ryan D. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> ZenTest version 3.4.0 has been released!
> 
> [zentest | software projects | by ryan davis](http://www.zenspider.com/ZSS/Products/ZenTest/)

The RubyForge link on the download page doesn’t work for me; changing  
it from [rubyforge.net](http://rubyforge.net) to .org fixes this.

I can’t remember whether RubyForge was ever at [rubyforge.net](http://rubyforge.net), but that  
domain doesn’t seem to be working now.

Psul.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2006, 9:58pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/zentest-3-4-0-released/68502/3 "2006-09-13T21:58:23Z")

</div>

On Sep 13, 2006, at 6:38 AM, Paul B. wrote:

> On 13/09/06, Ryan D. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:
> 
> > ZenTest version 3.4.0 has been released!
> > 
> > [zentest | software projects | by ryan davis](http://www.zenspider.com/ZSS/Products/ZenTest/)
> 
> The RubyForge link on the download page doesn’t work for me; changing  
> it from [rubyforge.net](http://rubyforge.net) to .org fixes this.
> 
> I can’t remember whether RubyForge was ever at [rubyforge.net](http://rubyforge.net), but that  
> domain doesn’t seem to be working now.

oops! fixed. thanks! I think it was just a brain-o on my part.