Why dont you go for SciTE editor. It is simple and powerful
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
[email protected] wrote:
I agree, there’s nothing as powerful as Emacs. I have yet to find
something it can’t do.Display an attractive GUI? Or have things changed?
Looks really nice to me:
http://static.destiney.com/emacs_screen_shot.jpg
–
Greg D.
http://destiney.com/
Greg D. wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
[email protected] wrote:I agree, there’s nothing as powerful as Emacs. �I have yet to find
something it can’t do.Display an attractive GUI? �Or have things changed?
Looks really nice to me:
http://static.destiney.com/emacs_screen_shot.jpg
–
Impressive. Is that xemacs + Cygwin, or what?
Greg D.
http://destiney.com/
Best,
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
[email protected]
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Saravanan K.
[email protected] wrote:
Why dont you go for SciTE editor. It is simple and powerful
…becase my editor is simple and powerful and I’m happy with it?
–
Leonardo M…
There’s no place like ~
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
[email protected] wrote:
Impressive. Is that xemacs + Cygwin, or what?
That’s plain old Emacs 23.1 on Windows 7.
http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/emacs/windows/
–
Greg D.
http://destiney.com/
Greg D. wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
[email protected] wrote:Impressive. �Is that xemacs + Cygwin, or what?
That’s plain old Emacs 23.1 on Windows 7.
Interesting. The last time I ran Emacs in a graphical environment, it
looked nowhere near that good – in fact, I considered it pretty much an
unusable eyesore. I’ll have to investigate further, or perhaps give
Aquamacs another try.
–
Greg D.
http://destiney.com/
Best,
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
[email protected]