# Wiki down/offline?

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/wiki-down-offline/109862>\
**Category:** Radiant CMS\
**Created:** [July 19, 2007, 7:05pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/wiki-down-offline/109862 "2007-07-19T19:05:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![soster](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/848f3c/32.png) [@soster](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/soster)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2007, 7:05pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/wiki-down-offline/109862/1 "2007-07-19T19:05:25Z")

</div>

I’m just getting started with Radiant and trying to whip up a new  
extension. I’ve been using the link here:  
[http://wiki.radiantcms.org/Creating\_Radiant\_Extensions](http://wiki.radiantcms.org/Creating_Radiant_Extensions) but the wiki  
seems  
down. Either I get nothing or “Server Unavailable”. Is this an issue  
with  
Junebug or the host?

As an aside, I miss the trac wiki, which seemed faster. As a developer  
I  
prefer to keep the docs close to the ticketing system. Odd I know as  
people  
here seem to like to separate them but I often find the closer things  
are  
the more integration you get, similar to the agile technique of placing  
your  
developers at the customer site so they can have direct interaction.

Shawn Oster

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![soster](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/848f3c/32.png) [@soster](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/soster)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2007, 7:19pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/wiki-down-offline/109862/2 "2007-07-19T19:19:27Z")

</div>

Shawn Oster wrote:

> I’m just getting started with Radiant and trying to whip up a new  
> extension. I’ve been using the link here:  
> [http://wiki.radiantcms.org/Creating\_Radiant\_Extensions](http://wiki.radiantcms.org/Creating_Radiant_Extensions) but the wiki seems  
> down. Either I get nothing or “Server Unavailable”. Is this an issue with  
> Junebug or the host?

It should be back up now. I’ve been pretty disappointed in the  
performance of late. It seemed to be pretty speedy when I first  
installed it, but it doesn’t seem to be running very fast right now.

> As an aside, I miss the trac wiki, which seemed faster. As a developer I  
> prefer to keep the docs close to the ticketing system. Odd I know as people  
> here seem to like to separate them but I often find the closer things are  
> the more integration you get, similar to the agile technique of placing your  
> developers at the customer site so they can have direct interaction.

I sympathize with that perspective, but we had a lot of people who had  
difficulty finding the documentation in the first place. Making it top  
level has really helped. This is similar to the approach taken on the  
Ruby on Rails site.

–  
John L.  
[http://wiseheartdesign.com](http://wiseheartdesign.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![soster](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/848f3c/32.png) [@soster](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/soster)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2007, 10:20pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/wiki-down-offline/109862/3 "2007-07-19T22:20:53Z")

</div>

Well, as long as I can at least get to it now 🙂 I agree, the speed is  
rather disappointing, hopefully improvements will be made.