# Which Railshoster for a productive application in US?

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/which-railshoster-for-a-productive-application-in-us/152653>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [November 6, 2008, 1:49am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/which-railshoster-for-a-productive-application-in-us/152653 "2008-11-06T01:49:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mcrj45](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/f1d935/32.png) [@mcrj45](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mcrj45)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 1:49am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/which-railshoster-for-a-productive-application-in-us/152653/1 "2008-11-06T01:49:51Z")

</div>

Dear Receiver and Forummembers ;),  
I’m looking for a hoster in the US which provides the best enviroment  
for a Ruby on Rails application. This should include Managed Server  
Support by the Linux Administration (I have no experiences with Linux so  
far), Backup and monitoring.  
The load on the server will be around 200 active customers per day (so  
really less, but the need to be served quick)

Which hoster can you recommend? Which hoster do you use? Which hoster  
should not be used for such a project?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mcrj45](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/f1d935/32.png) [@mcrj45](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mcrj45)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 2:18am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/which-railshoster-for-a-productive-application-in-us/152653/2 "2008-11-06T02:18:30Z")

</div>

EngineYard. However if you can’t afford that, RailsMachine is going  
to be the next best but the support is nowhere near the same level.

On Nov 5, 4:49 pm, Knut L. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)
