# What's the skinny on RedCloth4?

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/whats-the-skinny-on-redcloth4/151753>\
**Category:** Radiant CMS\
**Created:** [October 25, 2008, 5:15am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/whats-the-skinny-on-redcloth4/151753 "2008-10-25T05:15:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nateless](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/96bed5/32.png) [@nateless](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/nateless)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2008, 5:15am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/whats-the-skinny-on-redcloth4/151753/1 "2008-10-25T05:15:12Z")

</div>

I was working the Google on the internet machine looking for the  
official  
low-down on RC 4 and noticed that Jason G. submitted a ticket at  
Lighthouse for Radiant 0.6.10 to include a way to tell Radiant to use  
the RC  
gem instead of the included (& flawed?) RC 3.0.4. The task had been  
assigned  
to Sean for the 0.6.10 release. Weeeeelll, since there will be no  
0.6.10, I  
was wondering is this something that was planned for the sprint this  
weekend?

If not, no biggie, I’ll just use Jason’s extension. Is this still the  
proper  
method for using RC 4 with Radiant or is there a better new-fangled  
method?

~Nate