# Web archive for ruby newsgroup

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [February 25, 2008, 8:15pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754 "2008-02-25T20:15:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/43a26b/32.png) [@Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ward_B)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2008, 8:15pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754/1 "2008-02-25T20:15:38Z")

</div>

Just live:

Ruby Newsgroup Archive : A simple & searchable web-archive for  
comp.lang.ruby. (build with Ruby on Rails). Find only anwers because we  
do not show messages without a reply. 😉

ruby.equanimity.nl

Regards,

Ward

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/43a26b/32.png) [@Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ward_B)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2008, 8:30pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754/2 "2008-02-25T20:30:29Z")

</div>

And now with clickable link 😉

[http://ruby.equanimity.nl](http://ruby.equanimity.nl)

On 2008-02-25 20:10:04 +0100, Ward B. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
said:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/43a26b/32.png) [@Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ward_B)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2008, 8:38pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754/3 "2008-02-25T20:38:12Z")

</div>

On Feb 25, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Ward B. wrote:

> Just live:
> 
> Ruby Newsgroup Archive : A simple & searchable web-archive for  
> comp.lang.ruby. (build with Ruby on Rails). Find only anwers because  
> we do not show messages without a reply. 😉
> 
> ruby.equanimity.nl

How is it better than:

[http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/ruby/ruby-talk/index.shtml](http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/ruby/ruby-talk/index.shtml)

Search seems broken, I get 0 hits for my name, but nearly 4000 results  
on the official archive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/43a26b/32.png) [@Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ward_B)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2008, 9:22pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754/4 "2008-02-25T21:22:03Z")

</div>

Hoi!

- Ward B., 2008-02-26, 04:14:

> ruby.equanimity.nl

Images for RoR and Ubuntu yield

502 Bad Gateway  
nginx/0.5.26

Search for message numbers fails

Tot lezens,

Josef ‘Jupp’ Schugt

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/43a26b/32.png) [@Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ward_B)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2008, 7:25am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754/5 "2008-02-26T07:25:31Z")

</div>

The name of the poster is not indexed currently. Only message body &  
subject are. I believe it’s not really needed. I’m pondering if I  
should make a top x of posters page, but for now it’s more important to  
get a bigger set of past usenet messages.

Regards,

Ward

On 2008-02-25 20:42:22 +0100, Aria S. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) said:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/43a26b/32.png) [@Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ward_B)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2008, 8:43pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754/6 "2008-02-25T20:43:32Z")

</div>

> Search seems broken, I get 0 hits for my name, but nearly 4000  
> results on the official archive.

Ditto.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/43a26b/32.png) [@Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ward_B)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2008, 4:27pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754/7 "2008-02-26T16:27:12Z")

</div>

On Feb 25, 11:10 am, Ward B. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> Ruby Newsgroup Archive : A simple & searchable web-archive for  
> comp.lang.ruby. (build with Ruby on Rails). Find only anwers because we  
> do not show messages without a reply. 😉
> 
> ruby.equanimity.nl

I’m guessing it hasn’t indexed many messages yet? I get only two hits  
for the word “duck”. 😉

At any rate, I can see how something like this could potentially  
evolve into something useful, although I agree with Eric H. that  
you’ve got some work in front of you to make it better (for some  
purposes) than either blade or the Google G. interface.

–  
Regards,

John W.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/43a26b/32.png) [@Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ward_B)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2008, 1:00am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754/8 "2008-02-27T01:00:55Z")

</div>

On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 15:24 +0900, Ward B. wrote:

> The name of the poster is not indexed currently. Only message body &  
> subject are. I believe it’s not really needed. I’m pondering if I  
> should make a top x of posters page, but for now it’s more important to  
> get a bigger set of past usenet messages.

Ah, I guess in these days of google to expect full-text search by  
default. I know I definitely search the archive by name often –  
Neukirchen, Fernandez, I’m often looking for a certain someone’s work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/43a26b/32.png) [@Ward\_B](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ward_B)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2008, 6:13am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/web-archive-for-ruby-newsgroup/186754/9 "2008-02-27T06:13:49Z")

</div>

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:24 AM, John W. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
wrote:

> I’m guessing it hasn’t indexed many messages yet? I get only two hits  
> for the word “duck”. 😉
> 
> At any rate, I can see how something like this could potentially  
> evolve into something useful, although I agree with Eric H. that  
> you’ve got some work in front of you to make it better (for some  
> purposes) than either blade or the Google G. interface.
> 
> –

Or Nabble, or gmane, or any of the countless other tools that already  
do this quite nicely.

- Rob

> **[Home](https://robsanheim.com/)**
>
> Just another WordPress site
