# Un 1.0.0 Released **URL:** \ **Category:** Ruby\ **Created:** [November 8, 2008, 3:39am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/un-1-0-0-released/152848 "2008-11-08T03:39:27Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2008, 3:39am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/un-1-0-0-released/152848/1 "2008-11-08T03:39:27Z")
un version 1.0.0 has been released! - [http://rubyforge.org/projects/seattlerb](http://rubyforge.org/projects/seattlerb) un provides unextend and uninclude to allow for a better prototype-oriented programming experience. Changes: ### 1.0.0 / 2008-11-07 - 1 major enhancement - [http://rubyforge.org/projects/seattlerb](http://rubyforge.org/projects/seattlerb) ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2008, 5:52am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/un-1-0-0-released/152848/2 "2008-11-08T05:52:42Z")
On Nov 7, 9:36 pm, Ryan D. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > un version 1.0.0 has been released! > > - [http://rubyforge.org/projects/seattlerb](http://rubyforge.org/projects/seattlerb) > > un provides unextend and uninclude to allow for a better > prototype-oriented programming experience. Why another when we already have Mixology and Mixco? [http://github.com/why/mixico/tree/master](http://github.com/why/mixico/tree/master) [http://www.somethingnimble.com/bliki/mixology](http://www.somethingnimble.com/bliki/mixology) -7rans. ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2008, 2:51pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/un-1-0-0-released/152848/3 "2008-11-08T14:51:40Z")
On Nov 7, 2008, at 23:50 , Trans wrote: > Why another when we already have Mixology and Mixco? oh… the irony… ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2008, 7:22pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/un-1-0-0-released/152848/4 "2008-11-08T19:22:30Z")
Hi, In message “Re: [ANN] un 1.0.0 Released” on Sat, 8 Nov 2008 11:36:32 +0900, Ryan D. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) writes: |un version 1.0.0 has been released! Ah, did you know we have a library file un.rb in the standard distribution? ``` matz. ``` ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2008, 7:46am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/un-1-0-0-released/152848/5 "2008-11-08T07:46:41Z")
On Nov 7, 2008, at 7:36 PM, Ryan D. wrote: > ### 1.0.0 / 2008-11-07 > > - 1 major enhancement > > - Birthday! > > - [http://rubyforge.org/projects/seattlerb](http://rubyforge.org/projects/seattlerb) cfp:~ \> ruby -r un -e ‘puts “ruh-roh!”’ ruh-roh! cfp:~ \> head /opt/local/lib/ruby/1.8/un.rb # # = un.rb # # Copyright (c) 2003 WATANABE Hirofumi [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) # # This program is free software. # You can distribute/modify this program under the same terms of Ruby. # # == Utilities to replace common UNIX commands in Makefiles etc # problem? a @ [http://codeforpeople.com/](http://codeforpeople.com/) ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2008, 9:17pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/un-1-0-0-released/152848/6 "2008-11-08T21:17:34Z")
On Nov 8, 2008, at 01:43 , ara.t.howard wrote: > cfp:~ \> ruby -r un -e ‘puts “ruh-roh!”’ > ruh-roh! > > problem? gah. I forgot about it… I doubt much of anyone uses the stdlib un.rb, but given this additional problem, I should still prolly rename it: 520 % ruby -e ‘require “rubygems”; require “un”; p Un::VERSION’ -e:1: uninitialized constant Un (NameError) bad 521 % ruby -e ‘require “rubygems”; gem “un”; require “un”; p Un::VERSION’ “1.0.0” good enough, but kinda lame ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [November 9, 2008, 4:40pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/un-1-0-0-released/152848/7 "2008-11-09T16:40:14Z")
On Nov 8, 8:49 am, Ryan D. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > On Nov 7, 2008, at 23:50 , Trans wrote: > > > Why another when we already have Mixology and Mixco? > > oh… the irony… If you want to ask me about a project of mine, feel free. But I’m asking you about yours, b/c I want to understand the relative merits of the different approaches. T. ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2008, 9:24pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/un-1-0-0-released/152848/8 "2008-11-08T21:24:36Z")
On Nov 8, 2008, at 13:19 , Yukihiro M. wrote: > Hi, > > In message “Re: [ANN] un 1.0.0 Released” > on Sat, 8 Nov 2008 11:36:32 +0900, Ryan D. \ > > writes: > > |un version 1.0.0 has been released! > > Ah, did you know we have a library file un.rb in the standard > distribution? I did at one point, but I forgot. Given that it requires an explicit gem activation to get picked up, I will rename it: % ruby -e ‘require “rubygems”; require “un”; p Un::VERSION’ -e:1: uninitialized constant Un (NameError) % ruby -e ‘require “rubygems”; gem “un”; require “un”; p Un::VERSION’ “1.0.0”