# Thread, external processes, and trap

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/thread-external-processes-and-trap/68252>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [September 11, 2006, 5:55am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/thread-external-processes-and-trap/68252 "2006-09-11T05:55:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![James\_Mills](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/d78d45/32.png) [@James\_Mills](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/James_Mills)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2006, 5:55am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/thread-external-processes-and-trap/68252/1 "2006-09-11T05:55:09Z")

</div>

Hello list.

I have what I hope is a simple newbie problem.

I have a ruby program that is acting as a “controller” between a  
remote application and an external process. Basically the controller  
receives a command from the remote application, does some quick  
formatting, then connects to the remote process via an admin interface  
and sends the command.

In order to ensure that I have an external process to send information  
to, I spawn it and watch it from within the ruby controller. I also  
want to keep an eye on it and re-spawn it if needed. So basically I  
used Thread.new twice. The first thread is the process “watcher”  
which spans the actual process thread. Once it does this, the watcher  
thread sleeps until the process thread exits. If the process does  
exit for some reason, the watcher thread will respawn it a  
configurable number of times.

This actually works pretty good, in and of itself. The problem comes  
when I introduce a SIGINT trap in the main body of my code. The INT  
trap simply cleans up the running threads and exits. This also works  
fine by itself.

The problem is when I try and use ^C to exit the program _after_ I’ve  
already respawned the process thread. Here are a few scenarios:

1. watcher and proc threads up and running with no respawns. ^C is  
pressed - App exits as expected

2. watcher and proc threads up and running. I kill the external  
process manually - The watcher thread catches the fact that the  
process thread is no longer running and respawns it

3. watcher and proc threads up and running. I kill the external  
process manually, and the watcher respawns it. I press ^C - The  
process thread is killed and the watcher catches and respawns it! The  
trap code is never executed!!!

This problem has really frustrated me, and I hope the list can give me  
a hand. This is my first app using Threads, so go easy…

Thanks,  
~james

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![James\_Mills](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/d78d45/32.png) [@James\_Mills](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/James_Mills)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2006, 7:41am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/thread-external-processes-and-trap/68252/2 "2006-09-11T07:41:17Z")

</div>

James Mills wrote:

> In order to ensure that I have an external process to send information  
> to, I spawn it and watch it from within the ruby controller. I also  
> want to keep an eye on it and re-spawn it if needed. So basically I  
> used Thread.new twice. The first thread is the process “watcher”  
> which spans the actual process thread. Once it does this, the watcher  
> thread sleeps until the process thread exits. If the process does  
> exit for some reason, the watcher thread will respawn it a  
> configurable number of times.

> 1. watcher and proc threads up and running. I kill the external  
> process manually, and the watcher respawns it. I press ^C - The  
> process thread is killed and the watcher catches and respawns it! The  
> trap code is never executed!!!

That’s probably because a) the trap block is executed in the context of  
the watcher thread and b) exit uses an exception to terminate the  
process:

robert@fussel /cygdrive/c/Temp  
$ ruby -e ‘begin exit; rescue Exception =\> e; p e end’  
#\<SystemExit: exit\>

robert@fussel /cygdrive/c/Temp  
$ ruby -e ‘puts SystemExit.ancestors’  
SystemExit  
Exception  
Object  
Kernel

I guess you catch Exception in your watcher and not something more  
specific. You should probably either catch more selective or check the  
exception and act accordingly in your watcher thread.

Kind regards

```
robert
```
