# Support Ruby(Rails) Growth

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/support-ruby-rails-growth/164872>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [April 6, 2009, 11:17pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/support-ruby-rails-growth/164872 "2009-04-06T23:17:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![supasta](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/ebca7d/32.png) [@supasta](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/supasta)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2009, 11:17pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/support-ruby-rails-growth/164872/1 "2009-04-06T23:17:28Z")

</div>

Hey Ruby\Rails users, (like me)

I know that Prototype (_cough_ “jQuery”)is the library of choice for  
most rails developers. When it comes to enterprise level apps and having  
an extensive commercially supported library, you cannot beat ExtJS. If  
you want a great case study, look at [SalesForce.com](http://SalesForce.com) and how they have  
used ExtJS as their library of choice.

When I came across this poll today, I was shocked to see just how low  
Ruby was voted on (only 40 votes). I don’t post very often on forums,  
but I could not help but to share this and hope that fellow Rails/Ruby  
users will support it and vote.

Reload this Page Most Popular Server-Side Languages  
[http://extjs.com/forum/showthread.php?t=43322](http://extjs.com/forum/showthread.php?t=43322)

They have also just happened to (beta) release their new MIT Licensed  
Ext Core. Which boasts some impressive features and majorly competes  
with jQuery when looking for a core JS framework for websites.

[http://extjs.com/blog/2009/04/04/ext-core-30-beta-released/](http://extjs.com/blog/2009/04/04/ext-core-30-beta-released/)

While I use jQuery for my website front-end, and will be very hard for  
me to switch. When I think about the success of Ext Core, is that once  
my customers graduate past a simple website, I know that the full ExtJS  
3.0 is waiting for me. No longer do I have to worry about some small 3rd  
party _jQuery_ plug-in to do something my clients require. Gone is the  
worry that they will update and develop for years their â€˜projectâ€™  
plugin. I can release my projects and be secure in my personal  
reputation (and ability to support them for many years.)

Thanks all for supporting Rails (\*Ruby)

Chris Westbrook

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![supasta](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/ebca7d/32.png) [@supasta](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/supasta)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2009, 3:15pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/support-ruby-rails-growth/164872/2 "2009-04-07T15:15:27Z")

</div>

Chris Westbrook wrote:

> I know that Prototype (_cough_ “jQuery”)is the library of choice for  
> most rails developers. When it comes to enterprise level apps and having  
> an extensive commercially supported library, you cannot beat ExtJS. If  
> you want a great case study, look at [SalesForce.com](http://SalesForce.com) and how they have  
> used ExtJS as their library of choice.

Yay for Ext JS. The concept of having a rich JavaScript client  
application talking with a RESTful Rails application works very well for  
back-end applications. I can heartily recommend everyone to try it.  
SproutCore and Cappuccino are among the alternatives.

There’s this little chicken-and-egg problem between Ext JS and Rails  
where the two have different interpretations of RESTful resources.  
Nothing that a little customization can’t fix, but following Rails  
tradition it’d be great if Ext JS was compatible out of the box.

–  
Roderick van Domburg

> **[De domeinnaam Nedforce.nl is te koop.](http://www.nedforce.nl)**
>
> Deze mooie domeinnaam kan al over een paar minuten van jou zijn. Betalen gaat eenvoudig en vertrouwd via iDEAL. Direct na de betaling ontvang je de verhuiscode per e-mail en kun je aan de slag.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![supasta](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/ebca7d/32.png) [@supasta](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/supasta)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2009, 4:45pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/support-ruby-rails-growth/164872/3 "2009-04-07T16:45:01Z")

</div>

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Roderick van Domburg \<  
removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid\> wrote:

> Yay for Ext JS. The concept of having a rich JavaScript client  
> application talking with a RESTful Rails application works very well for  
> back-end applications. I can heartily recommend everyone to try it.  
> SproutCore and Cappuccino are among the alternatives.
> 
> There’s this little chicken-and-egg problem between Ext JS and Rails  
> where the two have different interpretations of RESTful resources.  
> Nothing that a little customization can’t fix, but following Rails  
> tradition it’d be great if Ext JS was compatible out of the box.

Of course, if the cost were the same as rails “out of the box” that  
would be  
even better.

Cheers–

Charles

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![supasta](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/ebca7d/32.png) [@supasta](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/supasta)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2009, 6:26pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/support-ruby-rails-growth/164872/4 "2009-04-07T18:26:03Z")

</div>

Roderick van Domburg wrote:

> Charles J. wrote:
> 
> > Of course, if the cost were the same as rails “out of the box” that  
> > would be even better.
> 
> +1 on that one too. 🙂
> 
> –  
> Roderick van Domburg  
> [http://www.nedforce.nl](http://www.nedforce.nl)

It’s a start, but the new beta just happens to be released as MIT  
Licensed  
“Ext Core”.

[http://extjs.com/blog/2009/04/04/ext-core-30-beta-released/](http://extjs.com/blog/2009/04/04/ext-core-30-beta-released/)

On that same note, those of you that have a hard time with RDoc, check  
out the standard API Docs for ExtJS and Ext Core.

[http://extjs.com/products/extcore/docs/](http://extjs.com/products/extcore/docs/)

Even better, and not to hijack my own thread, but I started playing  
around with the Documentation Generator and … It works… Just find  
yourself with the Ruby (_shakes head_) “=begins” and “=end”.

I would say that this is a good “RDoc Alternative” for ruby code (And  
JavaScript as well.)

[http://code.google.com/p/ext-doc/](http://code.google.com/p/ext-doc/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![supasta](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/ebca7d/32.png) [@supasta](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/supasta)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2009, 5:59pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/support-ruby-rails-growth/164872/5 "2009-04-07T17:59:59Z")

</div>

Charles J. wrote:

> > Yay for Ext JS. The concept of having a rich JavaScript client  
> > application talking with a RESTful Rails application works very well for  
> > back-end applications. I can heartily recommend everyone to try it.  
> > SproutCore and Cappuccino are among the alternatives.
> > 
> > There’s this little chicken-and-egg problem between Ext JS and Rails  
> > where the two have different interpretations of RESTful resources.  
> > Nothing that a little customization can’t fix, but following Rails  
> > tradition it’d be great if Ext JS was compatible out of the box.
> 
> Of course, if the cost were the same as rails “out of the box” that  
> would be even better.

+1 on that one too. 🙂

–  
Roderick van Domburg

> **[De domeinnaam Nedforce.nl is te koop.](http://www.nedforce.nl)**
>
> Deze mooie domeinnaam kan al over een paar minuten van jou zijn. Betalen gaat eenvoudig en vertrouwd via iDEAL. Direct na de betaling ontvang je de verhuiscode per e-mail en kun je aan de slag.
