# Streamlined framework - Maturity? Background?

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-framework-maturity-background/65653>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [August 20, 2006, 7:33am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-framework-maturity-background/65653 "2006-08-20T07:33:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/71c47a/32.png) [@greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/greg)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2006, 7:33am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-framework-maturity-background/65653/1 "2006-08-20T07:33:39Z")

</div>

Hi,

Just found and started to look at Streamlined  
([http://streamlined.relevancellc.com/](http://streamlined.relevancellc.com/)). It looks very interesting  
however I couldn’t find a mailing list or contact me link. Just  
wondering:

[1] How mature is Streamlined? What sort of uptake does it have?

[2] It it opensource?

[3] Do people see it as a strategic add on to Rails at all (i.e. to  
complement rather than compete with rails)?

Tks

[PS My main aim was trying to select an authentication/authorisation  
approach of which someone suggested to look at Streamlined, but it seems  
to do much more than this.]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/71c47a/32.png) [@greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/greg)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2006, 10:55am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-framework-maturity-background/65653/2 "2006-08-20T10:55:04Z")

</div>

Greg H. wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Just found and started to look at Streamlined  
> ([http://streamlined.relevancellc.com/](http://streamlined.relevancellc.com/)). It looks very interesting  
> however I couldn’t find a mailing list or contact me link. Just

Perhaps leave a comment against one of their blog articles.

> wondering:
> 
> [1] How mature is Streamlined? What sort of uptake does it have?

It was demoed at Railsconf in July and released in August.

> [2] It it opensource?

Yes.

> [3] Do people see it as a strategic add on to Rails at all (i.e. to  
> complement rather than compete with rails)?

Complements.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/71c47a/32.png) [@greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/greg)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2006, 10:09pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-framework-maturity-background/65653/3 "2006-08-20T22:09:30Z")

</div>

Greg,  
It is fairly immature (pre-alpha). It is supposedly open source but they  
haven’t released it in source form yet (at least last time I checked).  
It is  
definitely complementary to rails. It relies on the rails framework to  
function. It will probably never be included in rails itself though as I  
doubt “better scaffolding” would ever be viewed as part of the core. I  
would  
love it if I was someday proved wrong on this though.

Jon

On 8/19/06, Greg H. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> –  
> Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/](http://www.ruby-forum.com/).
> 
> >

–  
Jon W.  
removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/71c47a/32.png) [@greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/greg)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2006, 10:47pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-framework-maturity-background/65653/4 "2006-08-20T22:47:34Z")

</div>

There is a list of auto admin on this site:

[http://streamlinedframework.net/articles/2006/08/17/the-auto-admin-ecosystem](http://streamlinedframework.net/articles/2006/08/17/the-auto-admin-ecosystem)

* * *

From: removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid  
[[mailto:removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)] On Behalf Of Jon W.  
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 12:45 PM  
To: removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid  
Subject: [Rails] Re: Streamlined framework - Maturity? Background?

Greg,  
It is fairly immature (pre-alpha). It is supposedly open source but they  
haven’t released it in source form yet (at least last time I checked).  
It is  
definitely complementary to rails. It relies on the rails framework to  
function. It will probably never be included in rails itself though as I  
doubt “better scaffolding” would ever be viewed as part of the core. I  
would  
love it if I was someday proved wrong on this though.

Jon

On 8/19/06, Greg H. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

Hi,

Just found and started to look at Streamlined  
([http://streamlined.relevancellc.com/](http://streamlined.relevancellc.com/)). It looks very interesting  
however I couldn’t find a mailing list or contact me link. Just  
wondering:

[1] How mature is Streamlined? What sort of uptake does it have?

[2] It it opensource?

[3] Do people see it as a strategic add on to Rails at all (i.e. to  
complement rather than compete with rails)?

Tks

[PS My main aim was trying to select an authentication/authorisation  
approach of which someone suggested to look at Streamlined, but it seems  
to do much more than this.]

–  
Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/](http://www.ruby-forum.com/).

–  
Jon W.  
removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/71c47a/32.png) [@greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/greg)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2006, 5:30am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-framework-maturity-background/65653/5 "2006-08-21T05:30:04Z")

</div>

thanks for the feedback to date guys

BTW - I was thinking of for my immediate user management needs looking  
at  
use of ActiveRBAC (i.e. not chewing off too much re 3rd party  
frameworks)  
for the moment. Any comments on this in relation to a potential option  
of  
going to Streamlined for this would be appreciated?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/71c47a/32.png) [@greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/greg)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2006, 11:09pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-framework-maturity-background/65653/6 "2006-08-20T23:09:35Z")

</div>

Greg H. wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Just found and started to look at Streamlined  
> ([http://streamlined.relevancellc.com/](http://streamlined.relevancellc.com/)). It looks very interesting  
> however I couldn’t find a mailing list or contact me link.

From their blog, it appears you can contact the developers via

streamlined AT relevancellc DOT com

> Just wondering:
> 
> [1] How mature is Streamlined? What sort of uptake does it have?

It is very new. DHH has just commented favourably on it, here:

> **[Streamlined: Taking admins beyond scaffolding](https://rubyonrails.org/2006/8/16/streamlined-taking-admins-beyond-scaffolding)**
>
> Justin Gehtland and Stuart Halloway has been moving along at a rapid pace on Streamlined since its unveiling at RailsConf in June. There’s now a public repository with the code available and they’ve put together a convincing screencast of its use.I...

Comments to his blog post were critical of the current look and feel,  
and the Streamlined team is addressing this by working with the  
developer of the Ajax scaffold.

If I remember correctly, Dave T. also mentioned Streamlined in his  
RailsConf keynote. He highlighted three directions in which he felt  
Rails needed to improve, one of which was high-quality scaffolding, and  
he mentioned Streamlined as a candidate for this.

The authors of Streamlined are well-respected people who have come to  
Ruby and Rails from the “Better, Faster Lighter Java” movement (Justin  
Gehtland co-wrote the book of that name with Bruce Tate).

[http://www.relevancellc.com/main/about](http://www.relevancellc.com/main/about)

So I would say: watch it carefully, try it out, if you like it and want  
it to move faster or in a particular direction, see if you can  
contribute.

> [2] It it opensource?

Yes, MIT license:

[http://svn.streamlinedframework.org:8079/streamlined/MIT-LICENSE](http://svn.streamlinedframework.org:8079/streamlined/MIT-LICENSE)

(Note that the subversion repository is now accessible, despite what it  
says on the download page)

> [3] Do people see it as a strategic add on to Rails at all (i.e. to  
> complement rather than compete with rails)?

Yes, it adds to Rails rather than competing with it.

regards

Justin F.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/71c47a/32.png) [@greg](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/greg)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2006, 5:44am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-framework-maturity-background/65653/7 "2006-08-21T05:44:05Z")

</div>

Greetings Greg - For my uses, I see this framework being useful to  
(quickly) pull together table editing for my (internal)  
administrators - where I’m not concerned so much with a particular  
look, but ease of data access.

Jodi
