# Streamlined and ActiveScaffold question

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-and-activescaffold-question/110152>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [July 23, 2007, 8:38pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-and-activescaffold-question/110152 "2007-07-23T20:38:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bmihelac](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/5fc32e/32.png) [@bmihelac](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/bmihelac)\
**Post date:** [July 23, 2007, 8:38pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-and-activescaffold-question/110152/1 "2007-07-23T20:38:37Z")

</div>

Hi all,  
I am evaluating Streamlined and ActiveScaffold for implementing simple  
backend system for rails application and both seems attractive, and  
packaged with nice features. I wander which one would be easier to  
extend to fit complex data scheme and especially if some of ActiveRecord  
associations types are not supported yet.

thanks for any thoughts and suggestions,  
Bojan

–  
Bojan M.  
 → Ruby on Rails and Web D. Blog : [http://source.mihelac.org](http://source.mihelac.org)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bmihelac](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/5fc32e/32.png) [@bmihelac](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/bmihelac)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2008, 9:46pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/streamlined-and-activescaffold-question/110152/2 "2008-05-25T21:46:59Z")

</div>

Any news on that? Streamlined seems very interesting indeed.