that.
Jörg W Mittag
Hello Jörg:
I found this interesting:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
It shows averaged scores of Ruby 1.8.7 (the Ruby MRI) vs Ruby 1.9.1 and
vs a
whole bunch of other languages.
Michael
that.
Jörg W Mittag
Hello Jörg:
I found this interesting:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
It shows averaged scores of Ruby 1.8.7 (the Ruby MRI) vs Ruby 1.9.1 and
vs a
whole bunch of other languages.
Michael
My own “real world” benchmark comparing 1.9 to 1.8:
-Doug Seifert
On Feb 26, 1:48 am, Douglas S. [email protected] wrote:
My own “real world” benchmark comparing 1.9 to 1.8:
By real world definition you should include IO operations (either
network or file based).
Ruby 1.9 is slower on IO on any platform (and worse on Windows) due
encoding functionality built in.
My real world problem is solve sudoku with a recursive method… very
real world ![]()
This forum is not affiliated to the Ruby language, Ruby on Rails framework, nor any Ruby applications discussed here.
Sponsor our Newsletter | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Remote Ruby Jobs