# Spec Coverage

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/spec-coverage/157234>\
**Category:** IronRuby\
**Created:** [January 8, 2009, 7:12pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/spec-coverage/157234 "2009-01-08T19:12:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![raker\_t](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/ecae2f/32.png) [@raker\_t](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/raker_t)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2009, 7:12pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/spec-coverage/157234/1 "2009-01-08T19:12:03Z")

</div>

Just to let people know where we are:

ruby core  
1118 files, 4850 examples, 18036 expectations, 82 failures, 219 errors  
1118 files, 4731 examples, 15341 expectations, 520 failures, 724 errors

14097/18063 = 78.0

ruby lang  
47 files, 652 examples, 1725 expectations, 2 failures, 0 errors  
ir  
47 files, 644 examples, 1643 expectations, 14 failures, 1 error

1628/1725 = 94.4

ruby lib  
1323 files, 3524 examples, 10663 expectations, 34 failures, 73 errors  
1323 files, 3507 examples, 11129 expectations, 362 failures, 491 errors

10276/10663 = 96.4

Libs is probably wrong. There is no valid reason for IronRuby to have  
more expectations than Ruby. I’ll track that down and report again when  
I find the issue.

JD