# Select 1 I18N solution to keep RoR full stack

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/select-1-i18n-solution-to-keep-ror-full-stack/103635>\
**Category:** Rails I18n\
**Created:** [May 8, 2007, 6:43pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/select-1-i18n-solution-to-keep-ror-full-stack/103635 "2007-05-08T18:43:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Benoit](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/5daacb/32.png) [@Benoit](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Benoit)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2007, 6:43pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/select-1-i18n-solution-to-keep-ror-full-stack/103635/1 "2007-05-08T18:43:59Z")

</div>

[http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/InternationalizationComparison](http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/InternationalizationComparison)  
is exactly what RoR is not supposed to be : something where we have to  
select a solution out of 5 differents packages that are mostly doing the  
same thing.

I am new to RoR precisely because I am tired of the Perl “There is more  
than one way to do it” where you have to study 8 different API each time  
you want to do something new.

Will one I18N package be integrated into RoR, and when ?

BenoÃ®t

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Benoit](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/5daacb/32.png) [@Benoit](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Benoit)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2007, 7:36pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/select-1-i18n-solution-to-keep-ror-full-stack/103635/2 "2007-05-08T19:36:27Z")

</div>

Benoit,

On 8.5.2007, at 19.43, Benoit wrote:

> you want to do something new.
> 
> Will one I18N package be integrated into RoR, and when ?

I don’t think any package will be integrated into RoR any time soon.  
Why? Because I18N and L10N mean totally different things to different  
people. Some people need to create a web app that works with many  
different languages. Some just need a solution that works with their  
native language other than English. Still l others need support for  
time zones and currencies. I don’t think anything as vague as an i18n  
library should be integrated into core Rails and I’m pretty sure the  
core people are even stronger behind that opinion than me.

Don’t let the “full stack” term trick you into thinking that Rails is  
a turn-key solution. It aims to be exactly the opposite. It doesn’t  
include user management or authentication â€“ for exactly the same  
reasons â€“ either, even though they are a much tighter subject then  
internationalization.

That said, I don’t think there are really that many options for  
specific needs, even though the page you mention might not convey  
that. The most popular options have mostly different targets (even  
though they might overlap somewhat), and it pays to read their home  
pages for closer info (there’s not that many of them, either). And  
there’s always this list where you can come and ask for suggestions  
for your exact needs.

Cheers,  
//jarkko

–  
Jarkko L.

> **[jlaine.net](https://jlaine.net/)**
>
> Your freedom to carry a gun messes with my freedom to walk around without fear. Your freedom to “stand your ground” with force is at odds with my …

> **[Home](https://dotherightthing.com/)**
>
> do the right thing

[http://www.railsecommerce.com](http://www.railsecommerce.com)  
[http://odesign.fi](http://odesign.fi)
