# RubyForge statistics **URL:** \ **Category:** Ruby\ **Created:** [May 8, 2007, 2:16am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rubyforge-statistics/103575 "2007-05-08T02:16:30Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/dfb087/32.png) [@Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Trans)\ **Post date:** [May 8, 2007, 2:16am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rubyforge-statistics/103575/1 "2007-05-08T02:16:30Z")
Anyone else notice FLVTool2 suddenly marched up into the top 10 RubyForge downloads? If I’m wrong about this, then my apologies, but given the specific nature of the project I suspect the 30,000+ downloads of RC5 weren’t made by 30,000 different people. Wouldn’t it be better if Rubyforge counted downloads on a per IP address basis? Just a thought. T. ---
**Author:** ![Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/dfb087/32.png) [@Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Trans)\ **Post date:** [May 8, 2007, 5:38am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rubyforge-statistics/103575/2 "2007-05-08T05:38:39Z")
On May 7, 7:16 pm, Trans [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > Anyone else notice FLVTool2 suddenly marched up into the top 10 > RubyForge downloads? If I’m wrong about this, then my apologies, but > given the specific nature of the project I suspect the 30,000+ > downloads of RC5 weren’t made by 30,000 different people. Wouldn’t it > be better if Rubyforge counted downloads on a per IP address basis? > Just a thought. > > T. You are so right. I’m working on just a beast right now. You can track the progress on my blog ([http://blog.mmmultiworks.com](http://blog.mmmultiworks.com)). I should have the beta done before RailsConf (or at RailsConf). Get ready for gem statistics data sliced in every which way. I’ll also be at RailsConf and happy to show you a more complete demo. Matt Bauer Mosquito Mole Multiworks ---
**Author:** ![Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/dfb087/32.png) [@Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Trans)\ **Post date:** [May 8, 2007, 5:40am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rubyforge-statistics/103575/3 "2007-05-08T05:40:39Z")
On May 7, 7:16 pm, Trans [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > Anyone else notice FLVTool2 suddenly marched up into the top 10 > RubyForge downloads? If I’m wrong about this, then my apologies, but > given the specific nature of the project I suspect the 30,000+ > downloads of RC5 weren’t made by 30,000 different people. Wouldn’t it > be better if Rubyforge counted downloads on a per IP address basis? > Just a thought. > > T. You are so right. I’m working on just a beast right now. You can track the progress on my blog ([http://blog.mmmultiworks.com](http://blog.mmmultiworks.com)). I should have the beta done before RailsConf (or at RailsConf). Get ready for gem statistics data sliced in every which way. I’ll also be at RailsConf and happy to show you a more complete demo. Matt Bauer Mosquito Mole Multiworks ---
**Author:** ![Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/dfb087/32.png) [@Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Trans)\ **Post date:** [May 16, 2007, 1:56am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rubyforge-statistics/103575/4 "2007-05-16T01:56:07Z")
On May 7, 11:36 pm, Matt [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > You are so right. I’m working on just a beast right now. You can > track the progress on my blog ([http://blog.mmmultiworks.com](http://blog.mmmultiworks.com)). I > should have the beta done before RailsConf (or at RailsConf). Get > ready for gem statistics data sliced in every which way. I’ll also be > at RailsConf and happy to show you a more complete demo. Look forward to seeing it. (Though no RailsConf for me.) T.