# Ruby Reports Mailing List Split

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-reports-mailing-list-split/89794>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [March 22, 2007, 7:18pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-reports-mailing-list-split/89794 "2007-03-22T19:18:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![naething](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/e47774/32.png) [@naething](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/naething)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2007, 7:18pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-reports-mailing-list-split/89794/1 "2007-03-22T19:18:43Z")

</div>

Hi folks, if you’ve been following Ruby Reports in some way or  
another, you might have noticed that it’s been pretty quiet lately in  
terms of announcements / list activity.

This is definitely _not_ an indication of development slowing. It’s  
actually the opposite in that Mike Milner and myself have been hacking  
away on our development version of Ruport working to get it to 1.0

To help keep people looped who might be interested in patching Ruport  
or at least running on the bleeding edge, we’ve created a mailing list  
for development:  
[http://groups.google.com/group/ruport-dev](http://groups.google.com/group/ruport-dev)

I know it’s lame to have to apply for subscriptions, and we’ll  
probably change that post 1.0, but we don’t want to have people  
confuse it with our general purpose ‘come share ideas and ask  
questions’ list, which is still at:

[http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-reports](http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-reports)

The biggest difference between the two lists is the dev list will be  
useless to anyone not following trunk. The main list can still be  
used for reporting issues and making feature requests and whatnot, we  
just were looking for a way to talk about the ugly internals without  
spamming people excessively.

Anyway, Ruport 1.0 should be out around mid may, so hopefully I’ll  
speak to some of you before then 🙂

-greg