# Ruby\_parser 1.0.0 Released **URL:** \ **Category:** Ruby\ **Created:** [December 23, 2007, 12:03am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-parser-1-0-0-released/123976 "2007-12-23T00:03:19Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [December 23, 2007, 12:03am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-parser-1-0-0-released/123976/1 "2007-12-23T00:03:19Z")
ruby\_parser version 1.0.0 has been released! - [http://parsetree.rubyforge.org/](http://parsetree.rubyforge.org/) ruby\_parser (RP) is a ruby parser written in pure ruby (utilizing racc–which does by default use a C extension). RP’s output is the same as ParseTree’s output: s-expressions using ruby’s arrays and base types. ## FEATURES/PROBLEMS: - Pure ruby, no compiles. - Incredibly simple interface. - Output is 100% equivalent to ParseTree. - Can utilize PT’s SexpProcessor and UnifiedRuby for language processing. - Known Issue: Speed sucks currently. 5500 tests currently run in 21 min. - Known Issue: Code is waaay ugly. Port of a port. Not my fault. Will fix RSN. - Known Issue: I don’t currently support newline nodes. - Known Issue: Totally awesome. - Known Issue: dasgn\_curr decls can be out of order from ParseTree’s. - TODO: Add comment nodes. ## SYNOPSIS: RubyParser.new.parse “1+1” # =\> s(:call, s(:lit, 1), :+, s(:array, s(:lit, 1))) Changes: ## 1.0.0 / 2007-12-20 - 1 major enhancement - [http://parsetree.rubyforge.org/](http://parsetree.rubyforge.org/) ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [July 20, 2008, 6:47am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-parser-1-0-0-released/123976/2 "2008-07-20T06:47:10Z")
Ryan D. wrote: > ruby\_parser version 1.0.0 has been released! > > - [http://parsetree.rubyforge.org/](http://parsetree.rubyforge.org/) > > ruby\_parser (RP) is a ruby parser written in pure ruby (utilizing > racc–which does by default use a C extension). RP’s output is > the same as ParseTree’s output: s-expressions using ruby’s arrays and > base types. I assume this doesn’t work with 1.9 [the racc, at least]? Thanks! -R ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [July 23, 2008, 1:28am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-parser-1-0-0-released/123976/3 "2008-07-23T01:28:17Z")
Roger P. wrote: > Ryan D. wrote: > > > ruby\_parser version 1.0.0 has been released! > > > > - [http://parsetree.rubyforge.org/](http://parsetree.rubyforge.org/) > > > > ruby\_parser (RP) is a ruby parser written in pure ruby (utilizing > > racc–which does by default use a C extension). RP’s output is > > the same as ParseTree’s output: s-expressions using ruby’s arrays and > > base types. > > I assume this doesn’t work with 1.9 [the racc, at least]? > Thanks! > -R Answering my own question [in 1.9 SVN HEAD] > > RubyParser.new.parse “1+1” > > /Users/rogerpack/dev/ruby\_19\_installed/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.0/gems/ruby\_parser-1.0.0/lib/ruby\_lexer.rb:2617: > > [BUG] Bus Error > > ruby 1.9.0 (2008-07-23 revision 17865) [i686-darwin9.3.0] – control frame ---------- c:0029 p:---- s:0098 b:0098 l:000097 d:000097 CFUNC :method\_missing c:0028 p:---- s:0096 b:0096 l:000095 d:000095 CFUNC :old\_initialize c:0027 p:0029 s:0092 b:0092 l:000091 d:000091 METHOD /Users/rogerpack/dev/ruby\_19\_installed/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.0/gems/ruby\_parser-1.0.0/lib/ruby\_lexer.rb:2617 c:0026 p:---- s:0088 b:0088 l:000087 d:000087 FINISH :(null) … As a note 1.9 does include racc still, as an extension, so I don’t think this is expected. Guess I’ll file it away to the core people. -R ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [July 25, 2008, 12:24am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-parser-1-0-0-released/123976/4 "2008-07-25T00:24:25Z")
On Jul 19, 2008, at 21:41 , Roger P. wrote: > I assume this doesn’t work with 1.9 [the racc, at least]? > nope. it works with 1.9 just fine. why? ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [July 25, 2008, 5:42am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-parser-1-0-0-released/123976/5 "2008-07-25T05:42:48Z")
> I get a silent failure on 1.9.0-2, but it worked on 1.9.0-1. I’ll look > into it but would appreciate if you filed a bug. Thanks for looking into that. I filed something but it was a little obscure. [http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=21263&group\_id=439&atid=1781](http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=21263&group_id=439&atid=1781) Thanks! -R ---
**Author:** ![aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/43a26b/32.png) [@aguynamedryan](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aguynamedryan)\ **Post date:** [July 25, 2008, 1:45am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-parser-1-0-0-released/123976/6 "2008-07-25T01:45:49Z")
On Jul 22, 2008, at 16:22 , Roger P. wrote: > > > base types. > > > [BUG] Bus Error > > > ruby 1.9.0 (2008-07-23 revision 17865) [i686-darwin9.3.0] > > – control frame ---------- > c:0029 p:---- s:0098 b:0098 l:000097 d:000097 CFUNC :method\_missing > c:0028 p:---- s:0096 b:0096 l:000095 d:000095 CFUNC :old\_initialize > c:0027 p:0029 s:0092 b:0092 l:000091 d:000091 METHOD > /Users/rogerpack/dev/ruby\_19\_installed/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.0/gems/ > ruby\_parser-1.0.0/lib/ruby\_lexer.rb:2617 > c:0026 p:---- s:0088 b:0088 l:000087 d:000087 FINISH :(null) > … I get a silent failure on 1.9.0-2, but it worked on 1.9.0-1. I’ll look into it but would appreciate if you filed a bug.