# Ruby 1.9 on Rails 2.x?

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-1-9-on-rails-2-x/137882>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [May 17, 2008, 3:32pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-1-9-on-rails-2-x/137882 "2008-05-17T15:32:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jaume\_ArSSSSs](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/f1d935/32.png) [@Jaume\_ArSSSSs](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Jaume_ArSSSSs)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2008, 3:32pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-1-9-on-rails-2-x/137882/1 "2008-05-17T15:32:03Z")

</div>

¿What about ruby 1.9 and rails 2.x? ¿Does some one know if there is a  
migration plan on works?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jaume\_ArSSSSs](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/f1d935/32.png) [@Jaume\_ArSSSSs](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Jaume_ArSSSSs)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2008, 3:53pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-1-9-on-rails-2-x/137882/2 "2008-05-17T15:53:48Z")

</div>

On 17 May 2008, at 14:06, Jaume Arús wrote:

> ¿What about ruby 1.9 and rails 2.x? ¿Does some one know if there is a  
> migration plan on works?

Last I heard there’s still a bug in 1.9 that breaks some parts of  
rails, but other than that it’s pretty much all good thanks to Jeremy  
Kemper’s hard work

Fred