# Ruby 1.8.5-p12 released

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-1-8-5-p12-released/80380>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [December 25, 2006, 11:51am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-1-8-5-p12-released/80380 "2006-12-25T11:51:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Urabe\_S](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/ecc23a/32.png) [@Urabe\_S](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Urabe_S)\
**Post date:** [December 25, 2006, 11:51am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-1-8-5-p12-released/80380/1 "2006-12-25T11:51:37Z")

</div>

Hi all.

We released Ruby 1.8.5-p12, the latest stable version of Ruby. There are  
several fixes made when 1.8.5 had not been branched yet. On this release  
we backported them into 1.8.5.

```
ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/ruby-1.8.5-p12.tar.gz
d7d12dd9124c9b7d55cdbbee313e3931

```

Happy holiday.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Urabe\_S](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/ecc23a/32.png) [@Urabe\_S](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Urabe_S)\
**Post date:** [December 25, 2006, 10:06pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-1-8-5-p12-released/80380/2 "2006-12-25T22:06:28Z")

</div>

Urabe S. wrote:

> 

And the good folks at Gentoo have put it in the Portage tree. I just  
installed it (flawlessly, of course) on a P3.

–  
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST, ACMC(P)  
[http://borasky-research.blogspot.com/](http://borasky-research.blogspot.com/)

If God had meant for carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given  
rabbits fire.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Urabe\_S](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/ecc23a/32.png) [@Urabe\_S](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Urabe_S)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2006, 11:01am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-1-8-5-p12-released/80380/3 "2006-12-27T11:01:58Z")

</div>

Urabe S. wrote:

> Hi all.
> 
> We released Ruby 1.8.5-p12, the latest stable version of Ruby. There are  
> several fixes made when 1.8.5 had not been branched yet. On this release  
> we backported them into 1.8.5.
> 
> ```
> ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/ruby-1.8.5-p12.tar.gz
> d7d12dd9124c9b7d55cdbbee313e3931
> 
> ```
> 
> Happy holiday.

Builds and installs OK on Mac OS X 10.3.9. I have a question though:  
When I run “make test-all”, it takes a very long time (I killed it  
after 28 minutes) and some of the tests give errors (not failures). Is  
this correct?

Thanks,  
AdSR

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Urabe\_S](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/ecc23a/32.png) [@Urabe\_S](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Urabe_S)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2007, 3:49pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ruby-1-8-5-p12-released/80380/4 "2007-02-04T15:49:43Z")

</div>

On 12/27/06, AdSR [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:  
[…]

> Builds and installs OK on Mac OS X 10.3.9. I have a question though:  
> When I run “make test-all”, it takes a very long time (I killed it  
> after 28 minutes) and some of the tests give errors (not failures). Is  
> this correct?

On my linux box, I have no errors, but only 4 failures (like with  
1.8.4):

Finished in 127.413555 seconds.

1. Failure:  
test\_delete(TestDBM) [./dbm/test\_dbm.rb:332]:  
 exception expected but none was thrown.

2. Failure:  
test\_delete(TestGDBM) [./gdbm/test\_gdbm.rb:442]:  
 exception expected but none was thrown.

3. Failure:  
test\_s\_open\_error(TestGDBM) [./gdbm/test\_gdbm.rb:200]:  
Errno::EACCES exception expected but none was thrown.

4. Failure:  
test\_s\_open\_error(TestSDBM) [./sdbm/test\_sdbm.rb:123]:  
Errno::EACCES exception expected but none was thrown.

1608 tests, 16529 assertions, 4 failures, 0 errors

Cheers,
