# RSpec-1.1.8 **URL:** \ **Category:** Ruby\ **Created:** [October 3, 2008, 3:15pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rspec-1-1-8/150085 "2008-10-03T15:15:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![crucoba](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/e8c25b/32.png) [@crucoba](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/crucoba)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2008, 3:15pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rspec-1-1-8/150085/1 "2008-10-03T15:15:53Z")
Thanks to some very quick feedback on the 1.1.7 release, the RSpec Development Team is proud to announce yet another bug fix release: RSpec-1.1.8. RSpec-1.1.8 includes the following changes: == rspec-1.1.8 - 2 bug fixes == rspec-rails-1.1.8 - 2 bug fixes == Install [sudo] gem install rspec [sudo] gem install rspec-rails == More information > **[RSpec: Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby](http://rspec.info)** [http://rubyforge.org/projects/rspec/](http://rubyforge.org/projects/rspec/) > **[GitHub - dchelimsky/rspec: Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby](https://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec)** > > Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. Contribute to dchelimsky/rspec development by creating an account on GitHub. [http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/](http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/) ---
**Author:** ![crucoba](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/e8c25b/32.png) [@crucoba](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/crucoba)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2008, 7:29pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rspec-1-1-8/150085/2 "2008-10-03T19:29:08Z")
David, Can you tag this in git or push your git tags if you have done so locally ? Thanks, Zach On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:14 AM, David C. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > - restore colorized output in linux and windows w/ autotest (Tim > > [http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/](http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/) > > * * * > > rspec-users mailing list > removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid > [http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users](http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users) – Zach D. [http://www.continuousthinking.com](http://www.continuousthinking.com) > **[Homepage | Mutually Human](https://www.mutuallyhuman.com/)** > > Technology Made for Humans by humans Data Analytics Data Analytics Data has become a critical part of business for most organizations. We work with you to ensure you have confidence in your data, can properly access it, and present it in a way that... ---
**Author:** ![crucoba](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/e8c25b/32.png) [@crucoba](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/crucoba)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2008, 8:03pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rspec-1-1-8/150085/3 "2008-10-03T20:03:12Z")
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Zach D. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > David, > > Can you tag this in git or push your git tags if you have done so > locally ? Thanks, The tags have already been pushed - I can see them on github, can you not? ---
**Author:** ![crucoba](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/e8c25b/32.png) [@crucoba](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/crucoba)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2008, 8:10pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rspec-1-1-8/150085/4 "2008-10-03T20:10:53Z")
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM, David C. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Zach D. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > > > David, > > > > Can you tag this in git or push your git tags if you have done so > > locally ? Thanks, > > The tags have already been pushed - I can see them on github, can you not? I was doing git tag -l from the rspec-dev repository, which shows 1.1.4 and 1.1.5. From within the rspec and rspec-rails repositories I am seeing 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.1.6, 1.1.7 and 1.1.8 tags. Does the rspec-dev repository need to be tagged in general? – Zach D. [http://www.continuousthinking.com](http://www.continuousthinking.com) > **[Homepage | Mutually Human](https://www.mutuallyhuman.com/)** > > Technology Made for Humans by humans Data Analytics Data Analytics Data has become a critical part of business for most organizations. We work with you to ensure you have confidence in your data, can properly access it, and present it in a way that... ---
**Author:** ![crucoba](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/e8c25b/32.png) [@crucoba](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/crucoba)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2008, 9:11pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rspec-1-1-8/150085/5 "2008-10-03T21:11:30Z")
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Zach D. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > I was doing git tag -l from the rspec-dev repository, which shows > 1.1.4 and 1.1.5. From within the rspec and rspec-rails repositories I > am seeing 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.1.6, 1.1.7 and 1.1.8 tags. Does the > rspec-dev repository need to be tagged in general? That’s a good question. Right now some of the code examples for rspec-rails still live in the rspec-dev repo (in the example rails app). I’d like to change that anyhow. I’ll it going forward, and if we find a need for it we can figure out dates and do a best guess retroactively. Cheers, David