# RoR Hosting w/ Terabytes of Disk Space?

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ror-hosting-w-terabytes-of-disk-space/90919>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [April 3, 2007, 12:29am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ror-hosting-w-terabytes-of-disk-space/90919 "2007-04-03T00:29:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/b19c9b/32.png) [@geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/geopappas)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2007, 12:29am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ror-hosting-w-terabytes-of-disk-space/90919/1 "2007-04-03T00:29:04Z")

</div>

Are there any RoR hosting sites that have terabytes of disk space  
available?

Most of the hosting sites that I have seen only allow between 5 MB and  
500 MB.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/b19c9b/32.png) [@geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/geopappas)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2007, 12:54am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ror-hosting-w-terabytes-of-disk-space/90919/2 "2007-04-03T00:54:58Z")

</div>

On 03 Apr 2007, at 00:29, Geo P. wrote:

> Are there any RoR hosting sites that have terabytes of disk space  
> available?
> 
> Most of the hosting sites that I have seen only allow between 5 MB and  
> 500 MB.

I thought April 1st was 2 days ago already 🙂

I don’t want to sound rude or inpolite, and I have no idea what  
you’re up to, but if you can’t answer this question yourself, you  
won’t be able to setup a configuration like this yourself. It would  
involve setting up a clustered environment of dedicated servers,  
where your Rails app would actually be hosted on one box, leaving the  
data serving up to a balancer, serving your files transparently from  
vast number of servers, which in total could serve terabytes of data.

You’ve probably heard of the generous diskspace/bandwidth offerings  
from Dreamhost ([http://www.dreamhost.com/](http://www.dreamhost.com/)) and I don’t know how good  
they are in terms of hosting Rails apps. I have always found shared  
hosts to be good enough for small, low traffic apps, but not ready  
for high traffic/processor intensive/versatile Rails apps. At one  
point, you’ll need to have root access (or sudo rights) to tweak your  
setup.  
Shared hosting also has the (in my view biggest) disadvantage of you  
being dependent on both the hosting support for any server problem/  
upgrade (and they never fix it as fast as you yourself could on a  
dedicated box and do upgrades even if you didn’t ask for them, and in  
my case, mostly during Belgian business hours) and other users on the  
same box (one of them hits digg or is subject to a vulnerability  
attack and your site dies with it).

But if you want to host huge files and serve them through a web  
application, I think there are environments better suited for this  
than Rails. You are trying to use Rails for the things it’s not  
really good at and the stuff it excels at are hardly used.

Best regards

Peter De Berdt

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/b19c9b/32.png) [@geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/geopappas)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2007, 1:19am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ror-hosting-w-terabytes-of-disk-space/90919/3 "2007-04-03T01:19:20Z")

</div>

Peter De Berdt wrote:

> You’ve probably heard of the generous diskspace/bandwidth offerings  
> from Dreamhost ([http://www.dreamhost.com/](http://www.dreamhost.com/)) and I don’t know how good  
> they are in terms of hosting Rails apps.

I just went to their site, and their top package seems to allow 413.5 GB  
of disk storage ([Shared Hosting - Fast & Secure - 24/7 Support - DreamHost](http://www.dreamhost.com/hosting.html)).

Anyone else?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/b19c9b/32.png) [@geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/geopappas)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2007, 1:25am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ror-hosting-w-terabytes-of-disk-space/90919/4 "2007-04-03T01:25:00Z")

</div>

I don’t know why lots\_of\_storage == cluster. Amazon S3 is an extremely  
good  
and cost-effective way to warehouse terabytes of storage. However, it  
really  
isn’t clear what the OP is trying to do beyond locating a solution that  
meets his projected storage requirement.

I sympathize with his predicament, as I once had to (in the pre-S3 days)  
scour the planet for someone that would sell me a modest amount of  
server  
power with a boatload of attached storage. It’s not a typical  
requirement  
and finding the right provider can be hard.

With S3, you decouple your storage provider from the hosting service  
who’s  
responsible for serving up pages.

Peter De Berdt wrote:

> I thought April 1st was 2 days ago already 🙂  
> from Dreamhost ([http://www.dreamhost.com/](http://www.dreamhost.com/)) and I don’t know how good  
> same box (one of them hits digg or is subject to a vulnerability
> 
> >

–  
View this message in context:  
[http://www.nabble.com/RoR-Hosting-w--Terabytes-of-Disk-Space--tf3508661.html#a9800968](http://www.nabble.com/RoR-Hosting-w--Terabytes-of-Disk-Space--tf3508661.html#a9800968)  
Sent from the RubyOnRails Users mailing list archive at [Nabble.com](http://Nabble.com).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/b19c9b/32.png) [@geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/geopappas)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2007, 2:05am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ror-hosting-w-terabytes-of-disk-space/90919/5 "2007-04-03T02:05:03Z")

</div>

[www.layeredtech.com](http://www.layeredtech.com).

Contact them about getting a SAN.

Problem solved.

-carl

On 4/2/07, s.ross [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> and finding the right provider can be hard.
> 
> > won’t be able to setup a configuration like this yourself. It would  
> > point, you’ll need to have root access (or sudo rights) to tweak your  
> > application, I think there are environments better suited for this
> 
> –  
> View this message in context: [http://www.nabble.com/RoR-Hosting-w--Terabytes-of-Disk-Space--tf3508661.html#a9800968](http://www.nabble.com/RoR-Hosting-w--Terabytes-of-Disk-Space--tf3508661.html#a9800968)  
> Sent from the RubyOnRails Users mailing list archive at [Nabble.com](http://Nabble.com).
> 
> >

–  
EPA Rating: 3000 Lines of Code / Gallon (of coffee)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/b19c9b/32.png) [@geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/geopappas)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2007, 2:39am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ror-hosting-w-terabytes-of-disk-space/90919/6 "2007-04-03T02:39:05Z")

</div>

Hello Geo.

I noticed your post and would prefer to respond off list, but do not  
have an email to do so.

It just so happens I know of a service that can help you out. 🙂

–  
– Tom M., CTO  
– Engine Y., Ruby on Rails Hosting  
– Reliability, Ease of Use, Scalability  
– (866) 518-YARD (9273)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/b19c9b/32.png) [@geopappas](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/geopappas)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2007, 8:42am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ror-hosting-w-terabytes-of-disk-space/90919/7 "2007-04-03T08:42:04Z")

</div>

Have a look at [http://www.railshostinginfo.com](http://www.railshostinginfo.com) for a rundown of some  
more Rails hosting companies.

Kind regards,

Nick
