# Remarkable 4.0.0.alpha4 (pre-release) now available **URL:** \ **Category:** Rails\ **Created:** [June 11, 2010, 9:11pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/remarkable-4-0-0-alpha4-pre-release-now-available/190039 "2010-06-11T21:11:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![hosh](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/cab0a1/32.png) [@hosh](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/hosh)\ **Post date:** [June 11, 2010, 9:11pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/remarkable-4-0-0-alpha4-pre-release-now-available/190039/1 "2010-06-11T21:11:12Z")
> **[Remarkable 4.0.0.alpha4](http://ruby-lambda.blogspot.com/2010/06/remarkable-400alpha4.html)** > > Rails 3.0 Beta4 is out! and thanks to Louis T. we have released a alpha4 that tracks Rails 3.0 Beta4 . You will need to run RSpec 2.0 alp... Why Upgrade: You want to use this with Rails 3.0 Beta 4 > **[Rails 3.0: Beta 4 now, RC in days](https://rubyonrails.org/2010/6/8/rails-3-0-beta-4-now-rc-in-days)** > > RailsConf 2010 is underway and what better occasion to do the final stage of the Rails 3 beta program. We’re very pleased to announce Rails 3 beta 4, which we’ll be hammering on and tuning during RailsConf.At the end of RailsConf, we’ll be putting... Please keep in mind: remarkable/core, remarkable/active\_model, and remarkable/active\_record works. remarkable/rails does _not_ work. There are some other developers interested in tackling this. I’ve found you can do a lot of what remarkable/rails provides using the Rspec let feature (http://pure- [rspec-scotruby.heroku.com/](http://rspec-scotruby.heroku.com/)), assuming you don’t need i18n specs. I’ve posted this here since someone had commented on the Rails webblog asking about it. Ho-Sheng H. > **[lambda { }](http://ruby-lambda.blogspot.com)** > > lambda { put(self).in(:pipe).and.call() }