# Re: RubyForge bug fixes **URL:** \ **Category:** IronRuby\ **Created:** [May 11, 2008, 4:15pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-rubyforge-bug-fixes/137295 "2008-05-11T16:15:40Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![ksunair](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/b19c9b/32.png) [@ksunair](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/ksunair)\ **Post date:** [May 11, 2008, 4:15pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-rubyforge-bug-fixes/137295/1 "2008-05-11T16:15:40Z")
Hi Peter, Fantastic point, now that I am understanding the code, it makes perfect sense, I really appriciate the comments. Thanks. ----- Original Message ---- From: Peter Bacon D. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) To: removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 7:14:48 AM Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RubyForge bug fixes Hi Unnikrishnan, Just a couple of points you might find useful: ·        A number of overloads have parameters like …, object/_!_/ path, … What you are saying to the Specsharp tool is that object should never be null. Is this what you want? Can you pass nil into the methods in MRI? If you can then you need to remove the /_!_/. If you can’t then you probably need to add [NotNull] attribute or handle the case where the parameter is null within you method. Since you usually pass the value into CastToString, which handles the null case then probably removing the /_!_/ is what is required. ·        In Public Singleton methods I believe you can guarantee that the self parameter that gets passed in is actually the class that owns the method and so you can type this parameter to RubyClass/_!_/ if you want. Since the class is not being used in these methods it is not important, but it can save you a cast in other methods. ·        In some of the overloads you are using the Ruby regex classes. Do you know if MRI uses these and if so do they call the methods on them directly or via the Ruby method invocation process? If the latter then you need to use Dynamic Invocation to call the methods in your overloads [so that if someone monkey patches the Regex classes the behaviour shows up in the File class]. I suspect this is not the case but worth writing an RSpec for to check. ·        It might be worth pulling the MutableString objects that you use for comparison out into static readonly variables so that you don’t have to keep instantiating them every call. Such as: private static readonly MutableString dotStar = MutableString.Create(“.\*”); and private static readonly MutableString empty = MutableString.CreateEmpty(); Hope that helps. Pete  From:removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid [[mailto:removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)] On Behalf Of Unnikrishnan Nair Sent: Saturday,10 May 10, 2008 22:59 To: removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RubyForge bug fixes  Hi John,  Here is my code that I have, this is the first method I attemepted since this is one of the interesting logic. I thought I post my code for you to review as well. This passed most of the test as well  [RubyMethod(“basename”, RubyMethodAttributes.PublicSingleton)] publicstatic MutableString Basename(CodeContext/_!_/ context, object/_!_/ self, [NotNull]MutableString/_!_/ path) { MutableString[] tokens = path.Split(@“/”.ToCharArray(), Int32.MaxValue, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries); MutableStringreturnString = (tokens.GetLength(0) \> 0) ? tokens[tokens.GetLength(0) - 1] : path; if((tokens.GetLength(0) \> 0) && (returnString.GetChar(returnString.Length - 1).Equals(‘:’))) returnString = path; returnreturnString; } [RubyMethod(“basename”, RubyMethodAttributes.PublicSingleton)] publicstatic MutableString Basename(CodeContext/_!_/ context, object/_!_/ self, object/_!_/ path) { returnBasename(context, self, Protocols.CastToString(context, path)); } [RubyMethod(“basename”, RubyMethodAttributes.PublicSingleton)] publicstatic MutableString Basename(CodeContext/_!_/ context, object/_!_/ self, [NotNull]MutableString/_!_/ path, [NotNull]MutableString/_!_/ filter) { MutableStringfilename = Basename(context, self, path); //Treat ? specially if(filter.IndexOf(‘?’) \>= 0) returnfilename; //Treat .\* and exetions specially using regex if(filter.Equals(MutableString.Create(“._“))) { filter.Clear(); filter.Append(@”(?x)(.[^.]_$|$)”); } else { filter.Append(“$”); } RubyRegexreg = new RubyRegex(filter, System.Text.RegularExpressions.RegexOptions.Singleline); System.Text.RegularExpressions.Match mat = reg.Match(filename); if(mat.Success) filename.Replace(mat.Index, mat.Length, MutableString.Create(“”)); returnfilename; } [RubyMethod(“basename”, RubyMethodAttributes.PublicSingleton)] publicstatic MutableString Basename(CodeContext/_!_/ context, object/_!_/ self, object/_!_/ path, object/_!_/ filter) { returnBasename(context, self, Protocols.CastToString(context, path), Protocols.CastToString(context, filter)); }  Let me know what do you think? Yes, I found some problems with test spec as well, (bar.txt should be baz)  Thanks.   ----- Original Message ---- From: John L. (IRONRUBY) [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) To: “removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid” [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 3:25:16 PM Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RubyForge bug fixes Unnikrishnan N.: > Quick question, are these following assertions are correct? > >   should\_raise(TypeError){ File.basename(1) } >   should\_raise(TypeError){ File.basename(“bar.txt”, 1) } >   should\_raise(TypeError){ File.basename(true) } Yes they are. You can easily verify this in MRI yourself. In first and third cases, it hits the overload that accepts a nullable object as the first parameter. The TypeError is raised via Protocols.CastToString(). In the second case, it also hits an overload that accepts a nullable object as its second parameter, which raises TypeError via Protocols.CastToString(). FYI, this is the implementation of #basename that I have in my shelveset. It passes all of the (valid) specs - there are some legitimate bugs in our old copy of the specs (I haven’t checked with the latest version of the rubinius specs - I’ll do that next week). I’m a bit worried about how I’m handling the special cases for Windows. [RubyMethod(“basename”, RubyMethodAttributes.PublicSingleton)] public static MutableString/_!_/ Basename(CodeContext/_!_/ context, object/_!_/ self, [NotNull]MutableString/_!_/ path, [NotNull]MutableString/_!_/ extensionFilter) {   if (path.Length == 0)     return path;   MutableString trimmedPath = TrimTrailingSlashes(path);   // Special cases of drive letters C:\ or C:/   if (trimmedPath.Length == 2)     if (Char.IsLetter(trimmedPath.GetChar(0)) && trimmedPath.GetChar(1) == ‘:’)       return Kernel.FlowTaint(context, path, (path.Length \> 2 ? MutableString.Create(path.GetChar(2).ToString()) : MutableString.Create(String.Empty)));   string trimmedPathAsString = trimmedPath.ConvertToString();   if (trimmedPathAsString == “/”)     return trimmedPath;   string filename = System.IO.Path.GetFileName(trimmedPath.ConvertToString());   // Handle UNC host names correctly   string root = System.IO.Path.GetPathRoot(trimmedPath.ConvertToString());   if (extensionFilter.Length == 0)     return trimmedPathAsString == root ? MutableString.Create(root) : MutableString.Create(filename);   string fileExtension = System.IO.Path.GetExtension(filename);   string basename = System.IO.Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(filename);   string result = WildcardExtensionMatch(fileExtension, extensionFilter.ConvertToString()) ? basename : filename;   return Kernel.FlowTaint(context, self, (result.Equals(root) ? MutableString.Create(root) : MutableString.Create(result))); } [RubyMethod(“basename”, RubyMethodAttributes.PublicSingleton)] public static MutableString/_!_/ Basename(CodeContext/_!_/ context, object/_!_/ self, [NotNull]MutableString/_!_/ path) {   return Basename(context, self, path, MutableString.Empty); } [RubyMethod(“basename”, RubyMethodAttributes.PublicSingleton)] public static MutableString/_!_/ Basename(CodeContext/_!_/ context, object/_!_/ self, object path, object extension) {   return Basename(context, self, Protocols.CastToString(context, path), Protocols.CastToString(context, extension)); } [RubyMethod(“basename”, RubyMethodAttributes.PublicSingleton)] public static MutableString/_!_/ Basename(CodeContext/_!_/ context, object/_!_/ self, object path) {   return Basename(context, self, Protocols.CastToString(context, path)); } > Also, in the basename\_spec the test setup has wrong parameter on > File.open(@name, ‘w+’), if I change it to ‘w’, the test runs fine > otherwise none of the test works. This is correct. There is a bug in how we map the semantics of ‘w+’ to .NET IO. It’s fixed in my shelveset. Thanks, -John