# RE: Re: Re: PROPOSAL: The list needs to fork (desperately)

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-re-re-proposal-the-list-needs-to-fork-desperately/50436>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [December 16, 2005, 8:39am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-re-re-proposal-the-list-needs-to-fork-desperately/50436 "2005-12-16T08:39:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/90ced4/32.png) [@SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2005, 8:39am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-re-re-proposal-the-list-needs-to-fork-desperately/50436/1 "2005-12-16T08:39:38Z")

</div>

What is wrong with forking the list? Many other projects have forked  
lists so what is the reason it cannot be done for this list?

Opening your mail client to see that more than 300 mails have arrived  
within the last 16 hours is ridiculous. Unless you have nothing else to  
do…

/Torben

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/90ced4/32.png) [@SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2005, 9:09am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-re-re-proposal-the-list-needs-to-fork-desperately/50436/2 "2005-12-16T09:09:42Z")

</div>

On Dec 16, 2005, at 16:36 , Torben Wölm wrote:

> What is wrong with forking the list? Many other projects have  
> forked lists so what is the reason it cannot be done for this list?

Also, there is nothing preventing people from subscribing to more  
than one list: novices who need help getting started and want to  
follow what non-beginners are discussing can subscribe to two (or  
three) lists, as can non-beginners who want to help out those just  
starting out. It’s only limiting or splitting the community if you  
want to see it that way. Another way to look at it is focussing  
resources to where they’re best applied.

I think a well-maintained faq is also very helpful (along online  
docs) for referencing people to, uh, frequently answered questions.

Michael G.  
grzm myrealbox com

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/90ced4/32.png) [@SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2005, 9:15am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-re-re-proposal-the-list-needs-to-fork-desperately/50436/3 "2005-12-16T09:15:43Z")

</div>

Hi,

what do you think of adding this list to gmane ? It helps a lot for the  
searches.

Thibaut

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/90ced4/32.png) [@SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2005, 10:43am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-re-re-proposal-the-list-needs-to-fork-desperately/50436/4 "2005-12-16T10:43:11Z")

</div>

I had search before but could not find it… Which lead me to the false  
conclusion it was not there.

Thanks!

Thibaut

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/90ced4/32.png) [@SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2005, 9:43am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-re-re-proposal-the-list-needs-to-fork-desperately/50436/5 "2005-12-16T09:43:02Z")

</div>

Hi, Thibaut,

just for your bookmarks:

[http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rails](http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rails)

as well as

[http://www.ruby-forum.com](http://www.ruby-forum.com)

Regards  
Jan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/90ced4/32.png) [@SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/SSSiso-8859-1SQSTor)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2005, 1:20pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-re-re-proposal-the-list-needs-to-fork-desperately/50436/6 "2005-12-16T13:20:08Z")

</div>

Splitting the list based on user “types” would be a bad idea, IMHO.

Instead, I’d suggest splitting based on topic, for instance: into  
rails-support and rails-discussion

Regards,  
Tomas J.
