# Re: Qua(ck)

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-qua-ck/95947>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [June 20, 2006, 7:42pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-qua-ck/95947 "2006-06-20T19:42:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BergerS\_Daniel](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/bc8723/32.png) [@BergerS\_Daniel](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/BergerS_Daniel)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2006, 7:42pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-qua-ck/95947/1 "2006-06-20T19:42:58Z")

</div>

> > > In some of my documentation I have found this wording to
> 
> Hey, there’s actually some truth to that. The quaclass can be  
> used to make an object quack like another class. 🙂
> 
> T.

And thus, sine quaclass we could not make an object quack like another  
class.

Thanks, I’ll be here all week.

- Dan

This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential  
or  
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is  
strictly  
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication  
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and  
destroy  
all copies of the communication and any attachments.