# Re: Port a Library (#64)

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-port-a-library-64/100695>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [February 3, 2006, 5:00pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-port-a-library-64/100695 "2006-02-03T17:00:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BergerS\_Daniel](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/bc8723/32.png) [@BergerS\_Daniel](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/BergerS_Daniel)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 5:00pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-port-a-library-64/100695/1 "2006-02-03T17:00:56Z")

</div>

> -----Original Message-----  
> From: James Edward G. II [[mailto:removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)]  
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 6:16 PM  
> To: ruby-talk ML  
> Subject: Re: [SUMMARY] Port a Library (#64)

> libraries to port
> 
> > each month based on input from ruby-talk and other sources.
> 
> Ooo, I really like that idea.
> 
> Sounds like a project you just have to start, to me. 🙂
> 
> James Edward G. II

See [http://rubygarden.org/ruby?LibraryModules](http://rubygarden.org/ruby?LibraryModules)

Regards,

Dan