# Re: Meta-Meta-Programming

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-meta-meta-programming/64593>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [February 7, 2006, 11:26pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-meta-meta-programming/64593 "2006-02-07T23:26:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BergerS\_Daniel](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/bc8723/32.png) [@BergerS\_Daniel](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/BergerS_Daniel)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2006, 11:26pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-meta-meta-programming/64593/1 "2006-02-07T23:26:06Z")

</div>

> one to be an Integer. And the second one is a String.  
> Period." No discussion. I explained our duck-typing paradigm.  
> He’s not convinced. He thinks Java. So, he gets Java.
> 
> Lets check the types of the arguments of a method call!

Let’s use the strongtyping package on the RAA!

Dan