# Re: IronRuby moving to Github

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-ironruby-moving-to-github/154068>\
**Category:** IronRuby\
**Created:** [November 25, 2008, 1:44am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-ironruby-moving-to-github/154068 "2008-11-25T01:44:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![raker\_t](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/ecae2f/32.png) [@raker\_t](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/raker_t)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 1:44am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-ironruby-moving-to-github/154068/1 "2008-11-25T01:44:22Z")

</div>

We still need contribution agreements, but that is no different than  
Apache, Mozilla, and other major Open Source projects.

JD

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![raker\_t](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/ecae2f/32.png) [@raker\_t](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/raker_t)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2008, 2:04am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-ironruby-moving-to-github/154068/2 "2008-11-25T02:04:50Z")

</div>

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Jim D. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
wrote:

> We still need contribution agreements, but that is no different than Apache, Mozilla, and other major Open Source projects.
> 
> So is it the lieutenants’ responsibility to ensure that whoever they pull  
> code from has an agreement in place?
