# Re: Gem, Proxy and MS authentication

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-gem-proxy-and-ms-authentication/94513>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [May 5, 2006, 3:43pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-gem-proxy-and-ms-authentication/94513 "2006-05-05T15:43:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![McDevittS\_Chris](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/ebca7d/32.png) [@McDevittS\_Chris](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/McDevittS_Chris)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2006, 3:43pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-gem-proxy-and-ms-authentication/94513/1 "2006-05-05T15:43:30Z")

</div>

Pure Ruby? That would be great. Lets take it one step further lets make  
in modular enough to use with gems.

-Chris

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![McDevittS\_Chris](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/ebca7d/32.png) [@McDevittS\_Chris](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/McDevittS_Chris)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2006, 4:26pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-gem-proxy-and-ms-authentication/94513/2 "2006-05-05T16:26:50Z")

</div>

We have an NTLM implementation that we can wrap up as a gem easily  
enough  
and release on rubyforge. Let’s discuss offline, and if successful we’ll  
post back the results to the list, in case others are interested.
