Re: Correct method for "compressing" a power spectrum

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Marcus D. Leech [email protected]
wrote:

OK, so I decided to use the averaging method, rather than the maximum
method. It produces reasonably good looking plots:

http://www.science-radio-labs.com/files/spectral_example.ps

True, not bad. One surprise, though – what’s that notch around 1420.5?

It definitely has an “averaged” look to it – much like what you’d
expect
from time smoothing and not frequency necessarily. One thing that
low-level
heuristic grass might give you is a feeling that the relatively flat
segments are alive at least, sort of like comfort noise during vocoder
silence. If that matters.

Frank

Frank B. wrote:


For an omnipotent and omniscient being, God has made some really lousy
earthly staffing decisions. – John Cole
The Fc is 1420.4058e6Hz, and since it’s a direct-conversion receiver,
there’s always a little spectral artifact near DC.


Marcus L.
Principal Investigator, Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium

Hi,

From: Marcus D. Leech [email protected]
OK, so I decided to use the averaging method, rather than
the maximum
method. It produces reasonably good looking plots:
Marcus L.

Can you post a link to what you saw by the maximum method ?

Best Regards,

Firas

Firas A. wrote:

Can you post a link to what you saw by the maximum method ?

Best Regards,

Firas

I think what I’ll do is have an option in the spectrum window that
selects the compression method. Once I have that done, I’ll
post results.

Cheers


Marcus L.
Principal Investigator, Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium

Firas A. wrote:

Can you post a link to what you saw by the maximum method ?

Best Regards,

Firas

This is using the “max” method, at the same resolution and scale as the
average method:

http://www.radio-science-labs.com/files/spectrum_example_max.ps


Marcus L.
Principal Investigator, Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium

Frank B. wrote:

This is averaged both in frequency, and time. Each bin is smoothed
with an integrator–needed for doing astronomical work, like
showing the HI line, etc. The HI line is strong in relative terms,
but in absolute terms, it’s terribly weak :frowning:


Marcus L.
Principal Investigator, Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium