# RE: Classe 'normale' come ActiveRecord

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-classe-normale-come-activerecord/67988>\
**Category:** IT\
**Created:** [September 8, 2006, 10:49am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-classe-normale-come-activerecord/67988 "2006-09-08T10:49:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giuliano\_U](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/ecd19e/32.png) [@Giuliano\_U](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Giuliano_U)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2006, 10:49am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-classe-normale-come-activerecord/67988/1 "2006-09-08T10:49:41Z")

</div>

Occorre vedere di cosa hai bisogno effettivamente…  
In una c’è tutta la potenza e la “pesantezza” degli Active records,  
nell’altra una Struct snella ma assolutamente scarsa di funzionalità…  
A te la scelta 🙂