# Re: Best way to output decoded data to user **URL:** \ **Category:** GNU Radio\ **Created:** [April 15, 2014, 4:28pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-best-way-to-output-decoded-data-to-user/240465 "2014-04-15T16:28:55Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Detlef\_R](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/58f4c7/32.png) [@Detlef\_R](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Detlef_R)\ **Post date:** [April 15, 2014, 4:28pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-best-way-to-output-decoded-data-to-user/240465/1 "2014-04-15T16:28:55Z")
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Martin B. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)wrote: > On 04/15/2014 06:14 AM, Francois Gervais wrote: > > > I’m trying to figure out the best way to print the decoded data > > information of packets (received through gnuradio) to the user. File > > outputs are not really user friendly so I’m thinking of using a message > > queue out of my decoding block connected to the WX GUI Terminal Sink. > > Generally: Don’t use a message queue. Also, I recommend not adding any > WX widgets, unless you hate QT, because we’re trying to move away from > them. Moving away from wxWidgets? Then replace it with what? ---
**Author:** ![activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/c57346/32.png) [@activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/activecat_k)\ **Post date:** [April 15, 2014, 4:34pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-best-way-to-output-decoded-data-to-user/240465/2 "2014-04-15T16:34:15Z")
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 QT, like Martin was saying 🙂 On 15.04.2014 16:27, Activecat wrote: > > Generally: Don’t use a message queue. Also, I recommend not > > [Discuss-gnuradio Info Page](https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - [http://www.enigmail.net/](http://www.enigmail.net/) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTTUMSAAoJEBQ6EdjyzlHttvkH/22+aG4q8CaHF/s7MKYJ/70D gWmnsx4Dz4hd7kfPWomRQ7V4DPRfJwRXC3q7rUcPqAJ6A96bLmKasH5iuChsWF1c U3CsJvlYH9pt71JGjTn/XgwgQSYoOVtZQLLChZLTIZQgGOd1zG6NiobjIl+ujmPe 73BizMtNDDyKSS0Us4s8JCrK8iUUP++ckqN+BbUllE/ZrN7BEP0AT6y4UlHzjSw7 2Lttn8D2nvrqk64fcKLjCgTXuvrrOXRtEZYsGILAmlWl/ZmUbKwP+T6zGatCMNOX xcLFM/vS3160UU5fvXdDPfnQHcpoScqxyXRsxOu2Vqre5BS8rnQTB6s2mXlHgzc= =lu9f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---
**Author:** ![activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/c57346/32.png) [@activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/activecat_k)\ **Post date:** [April 15, 2014, 6:10pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-best-way-to-output-decoded-data-to-user/240465/3 "2014-04-15T18:10:27Z")
On 04/15/2014 04:32 PM, Marcus M. wrote: > QT, like Martin was saying 🙂 Right. We’ve discussed this on several dev calls, not sure if here on the list. In the far future, we want to focus on QT (for less dependencies etc.). We (or rather, Tom for the most part) have been porting all features of WX to QT the last few months, and on the current master, there’s pretty much nothing you can’t do with QT you could with WX. But don’t worry, WX widgets will be around for a while, but we won’t be adding functionality, and will be officially marking them deprecated them (most likely) in 3.8. _Maybe_ they will go away in 3.9, but that’s a long way ahead, nothing definitive decided here. Martin ---
**Author:** ![activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/c57346/32.png) [@activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/activecat_k)\ **Post date:** [April 15, 2014, 6:13pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-best-way-to-output-decoded-data-to-user/240465/4 "2014-04-15T18:13:24Z")
On 04/15/2014 12:08 PM, Martin B. wrote: > adding functionality, and will be officially marking them deprecated > them (most likely) in 3.8. _Maybe_ they will go away in 3.9, but that’s > a long way ahead, nothing definitive decided here. > > Martin > If you thought the 3.6 to 3.7 transition was hard for people, doing a > transition where the WX widgets are no longer available will be > even harder, by a significant amount. – Marcus L. Principal Investigator Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium > **[Live Draw HK Tercepat | Result HK | HK Pools | Live HK | HK Prize Hari Ini](https://www.sbrac.org)** > > Temukan live draw hk tercepat melalui halaman hk pools yang resmi dan dapatkan result hk prize melalui live hk secara langsung di situs kami. ---
**Author:** ![activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/c57346/32.png) [@activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/activecat_k)\ **Post date:** [April 15, 2014, 6:16pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-best-way-to-output-decoded-data-to-user/240465/5 "2014-04-15T18:16:22Z")
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marcus D. Leech [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > > WX to QT the last few months, and on the current master, there’s pretty > > transition where the WX widgets are no longer available will be > > even harder, by a significant amount. > > – > Marcus L. > Principal Investigator > Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium > [http://www.sbrac.org](http://www.sbrac.org) Which is why the WX widgets will stay around for a long time. (Longer than I’d want, I’m sure.) Tom ---
**Author:** ![activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/c57346/32.png) [@activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/activecat_k)\ **Post date:** [April 15, 2014, 6:21pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-best-way-to-output-decoded-data-to-user/240465/6 "2014-04-15T18:21:05Z")
On 04/15/2014 06:14 PM, Tom R. wrote: > Which is why the WX widgets will stay around for a long time. (Longer > than I’d want, I’m sure.) Yes, we’ll make it as gentle as possible. Also, there’s no reason for the WX widgets not to become an OOT. This would make the transition even easier, and we might even be able to provide a script to convert flow graphs to using the OOT with a couple of seds. Martin ---
**Author:** ![activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/c57346/32.png) [@activecat\_k](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/activecat_k)\ **Post date:** [April 15, 2014, 6:23pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/re-best-way-to-output-decoded-data-to-user/240465/7 "2014-04-15T18:23:27Z")
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 06:08:45PM +0200, Martin B. wrote: > But don’t worry, WX widgets will be around for a while, but we won’t > be adding functionality, and will be officially marking them > deprecated them (most likely) in 3.8. _Maybe_ they will go away in > 3.9, but that’s a long way ahead, nothing definitive decided here. That is good to know. I use WX widgets in my class, including a video series I’ll be publishing shortly, because they are the default in GRC and because of a few features of the instrumentation sinks. Also stability. Mike