# Random trivial ideas for improving Rails **URL:** \ **Category:** Rails\ **Created:** [November 12, 2005, 12:50pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/random-trivial-ideas-for-improving-rails/48176 "2005-11-12T12:50:04Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![rick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/9f8e36/32.png) [@rick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/rick)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2005, 12:50pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/random-trivial-ideas-for-improving-rails/48176/1 "2005-11-12T12:50:04Z")
Just a couple of thoughts: - Any reason why, when someone says they want to turn off the pluralizer, Rails doesn’t just - Any reason why ActiveRecord::Errors, which has an each() method, shouldn’t “include Enumerable”? Best, Rick ---
**Author:** ![rick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/9f8e36/32.png) [@rick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/rick)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2005, 12:50pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/random-trivial-ideas-for-improving-rails/48176/2 "2005-11-12T12:50:08Z")
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 11, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Rick B. wrote: > (this > came up here at the office when we submitted a pluralization- > related > patch to the fixtures subsystem). This is true. However, we turn off table name pluralization, not all pluralization. A minor distinction, but some users may rely on these semantics. I’d prefer to turn the valve at the source, as you suggest, after 1.0. Care to post an enhancement? > - Any reason why ActiveRecord::Errors, which has an each() method, > shouldn’t “include Enumerable”? Nope! Changeset 2981. Best, jeremy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDdQ9OAQHALep9HFYRAmrIAKDDID7IkkrI6t8GfLVIiYHfYt7bbQCg2Urb s85yS6z4mQEWikYvsf7G2WQ= =0UWD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---
**Author:** ![rick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/9f8e36/32.png) [@rick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/rick)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2005, 12:50pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/random-trivial-ideas-for-improving-rails/48176/3 "2005-11-12T12:50:11Z")
Hi ! 2005/11/11, Alastair M. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid): > I’m going absolutely nuts over this… any help would really really be > appreciated! You might also try SCGI: [http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/scgi\_rails](http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/scgi_rails) Fast and Ruby-based, with a module for Apache 1.3 or 2.0. That’s what I’m using for developing all my new apps. They’re deployed on Linux/FCGI, but my dev environment is fine with that. ## Bye ! François Beausoleil [http://blog.teksol.info/](http://blog.teksol.info/) ---
**Author:** ![rick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/9f8e36/32.png) [@rick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/rick)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2005, 12:50pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/random-trivial-ideas-for-improving-rails/48176/4 "2005-11-12T12:50:09Z")
Hello all, I’m having a hell of a time getting Rails running under Apache for Windows. I’ve created a rails app- myapp - and run it under webrick and it works fine. I’ve followed the instructions on [http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/Fast+CGI+and+Apache2+for+Windows+XP](http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/Fast+CGI+and+Apache2+for+Windows+XP) and I simply can’t get it working at all. Does anyone have any pointers to alternative setup instructions or have any suggestions? Basically it works to the point of: "Now open a browser and type in ?\YourRailsAppName? you should load the default Welcome to Rails page with blazing \FastCGI speeds." but if i was to do \MyApp\friends\view - for example, it can’t find the file which leads me to believe that the rails side of things is not working and it was simply loading the default welcome page as an ordinary html page. I’m going absolutely nuts over this… any help would really really be appreciated! Thanks, Alastair