# Rake task rails:upgrade:check is not working on windows. Rai

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rake-task-railscheck-is-not-working-on-windows-rai/194406>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [September 3, 2010, 9:55pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rake-task-railscheck-is-not-working-on-windows-rai/194406 "2010-09-03T21:55:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![krunal\_shah](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/f07891/32.png) [@krunal\_shah](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/krunal_shah)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2010, 9:55pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rake-task-railscheck-is-not-working-on-windows-rai/194406/1 "2010-09-03T21:55:00Z")

</div>

Is there any solution to solve the problem of rake task  
rails:upgrade:check on windows ?

I am getting this error …

Rake task fetching failed with (working directory:  
C:\projects\testproject)

rake aborted! no such file to load – popen4  
C:ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2383:in  
‘raw\_load\_rakefile’ (See full trace by running task with --trace)

EDIT:

To solve out this problem i have installed this gems …

gem install POpen4 -v 0.1.4  
gem install win32-open3  
gem install rak

But still not able to get proper output …

Is there any solution to run rake task rails:upgradeLcheck on windows ??

Is it causing problem with rak or popen4 ??

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![krunal\_shah](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/f07891/32.png) [@krunal\_shah](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/krunal_shah)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2010, 12:28am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rake-task-railscheck-is-not-working-on-windows-rai/194406/2 "2010-09-04T00:28:45Z")

</div>

So your running this? [GitHub - rails/rails\_upgrade: Plugin to run checks on your Rails 2.x/3.x to check for obvious upgrade points on the path to 3.0](http://github.com/rails/rails_upgrade)  
and after you installed those missing gems running “rake  
rails:upgrade:check” worked just fine?
