# Rails + Rest

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-rest/107276>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [June 19, 2007, 11:54pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-rest/107276 "2007-06-19T23:54:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![casper\_the\_ghost](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/58956e/32.png) [@casper\_the\_ghost](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/casper_the_ghost)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2007, 11:54pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-rest/107276/1 "2007-06-19T23:54:02Z")

</div>

I found myself blocked trying to think of Restful ways of doing  
things, until I subscribed to the peepcode screencast. Even so, I  
prefer using regular controllers in the initial stages when evolution  
of model relationships is not clear in the project. Is this the right  
way to do things ?

I noticed the edge version now uses Restful design by default (in  
scaffolds, etc). This may turn early adopters off of Rails when 2.0  
comes out. Hopefully, theres enough sugar in 2.0 so its not  
intimidating for people moving from non-restful applications.

thoughts ?