# Rails Optimization / Propaganda / Benchmark **URL:** \ **Category:** Rails\ **Created:** [December 11, 2007, 8:28pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-optimization-propaganda-benchmark/122754 "2007-12-11T20:28:07Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 2\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![fredistic](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/a8b319/32.png) [@fredistic](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/fredistic)\ **Post date:** [December 11, 2007, 8:28pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-optimization-propaganda-benchmark/122754/1 "2007-12-11T20:28:07Z")
This guy is benchmarking an erlang framework against rails and getting the wrong answer πŸ™‚ [http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2007/12/09/erlyweb-vs-ruby-on-rails-ec2-performance-showdown/](http://yarivsblog.com/articles/2007/12/09/erlyweb-vs-ruby-on-rails-ec2-performance-showdown/) Maybe one of you more advanced mongrel/cache configuration wizards can help rails look better in his benchmark? He’s currently showing ErlyWeb to be roughly 6 times faster. Surely we can goose rails up a little bit? fredistic ---
**Author:** ![fredistic](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/a8b319/32.png) [@fredistic](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/fredistic)\ **Post date:** [December 12, 2007, 6:17pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-optimization-propaganda-benchmark/122754/2 "2007-12-12T18:17:03Z")
I`m a erlang devel. The erlang language is really very fast, modular and we can change a piece of code on execution... I don`t like benckmarks! But i will take a look to it! I simple use what is better for what i`m trying to do πŸ˜‰ Regards, Luiz Vitor Martinez C… On Dec 11, 2007 3:48 PM, fredistic [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > little bit? > > fredistic > > > – Regards, Luiz Vitor Martinez C. [Grabber]. (11) 8187-8662 Eletrical Engineer at maua.br