# Rails not ready for production use?

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-not-ready-for-production-use/115530>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [June 27, 2006, 4:24pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-not-ready-for-production-use/115530 "2006-06-27T16:24:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/4bbf92/32.png) [@unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/unknown)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2006, 4:24pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-not-ready-for-production-use/115530/1 "2006-06-27T16:24:11Z")

</div>

* * *

Rails mailing list  
removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid  
[http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails](http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/4bbf92/32.png) [@unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/unknown)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2006, 4:38pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-not-ready-for-production-use/115530/2 "2006-06-27T16:38:05Z")

</div>

On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:22 AM, removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid wrote:

> waay too many dependency issues going on)…"
> 
> How much of this is true? If I develop on Windows and deploy to  
> linux, am I asking for trouble? Thoughts, opinions, concerns?

I don’t agree with this statement. Since Rails is such a new  
technology, change is just a way of life. I don’t see why you  
couldn’t just develop your current application against 1.1.2 and  
upgrade the internal once 1.1.3 or 1.2.0 comes out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/4bbf92/32.png) [@unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/unknown)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2006, 4:44pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-not-ready-for-production-use/115530/3 "2006-06-27T16:44:46Z")

</div>

* * *

Rails mailing list  
removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid  
[http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails](http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/4bbf92/32.png) [@unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/unknown)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2006, 4:31pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-not-ready-for-production-use/115530/4 "2006-06-27T16:31:36Z")

</div>

On 6/27/06, removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid  
[removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
wrote:

> How much of this is true? If I develop on Windows and deploy to linux, am  
> I asking for trouble? Thoughts, opinions, concerns?

Regardless of the technology, I wouldn’t do that with any project. Not  
without testing on your deployment OS before production release.