# Rails 2.0

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-2-0/123373>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [December 17, 2007, 5:36am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-2-0/123373 "2007-12-17T05:36:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![subash](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@subash](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/subash)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2007, 5:36am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-2-0/123373/1 "2007-12-17T05:36:01Z")

</div>

Many of them started working on rails 2.0, Is there any good tutorial  
for that. If yes, please put the material links here.

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![subash](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@subash](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/subash)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2007, 5:43am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-2-0/123373/2 "2007-12-17T05:43:35Z")

</div>

Isn’t it funny how putting the words “Rails 2.0 Tutorial” into a search  
engine, provided none-the-less by the same company who hosts this  
wonderful  
mailing list would actually result in the SECOND result being a Rails  
2.0tutorial!

Whodathunkit?

[http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Rails+2.0+tutorial&btnG=Google+Search&meta=](http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Rails+2.0+tutorial&btnG=Google+Search&meta=)

On Dec 17, 2007 3:06 PM, Subash Manickam  
[removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
wrote:

> Many of them started working on rails 2.0, Is there any good tutorial  
> for that. If yes, please put the material links here.
> 
> ## Thanks
> 
> Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/](http://www.ruby-forum.com/).
> 
> >

–  
Ryan B.

> **[frozenplague.net](http://www.frozenplague.net)**
>
> This domain may be for sale!
