# Rails 1.1 hosed my Apache!

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-1-1-hosed-my-apache/56404>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [March 30, 2006, 11:37pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-1-1-hosed-my-apache/56404 "2006-03-30T23:37:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lkfken](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/7bcc69/32.png) [@lkfken](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/lkfken)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2006, 11:37pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-1-1-hosed-my-apache/56404/1 "2006-03-30T23:37:37Z")

</div>

Just sharing an experience with you all – hopefully you take better  
precautions than I do. 🙂

I have a few sites built with Rails 0.8.3 that were ugpraded to 1.0.  
The newer sites are on edge rails. So when I heard 1.1 had come out,  
I unfroze my new apps, and installed the new gem for Rails 1.1.

The sites that was operating on edge rails worked just fine.

However, the sites that were working fine on 1.0 suddenly broke, and  
started spewing FCGI errors. Of course, I’m lazy and I didn’t check  
them right away. Serves me right.

So I woke up this morning to find that my apache has died. FCGI  
errors from apache filled all the logs as my sites were spidered by  
Google. Ooops.

For some reason I was under the mistaken impression that 1.0 -\> 1.1  
should not have been a problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lkfken](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/7bcc69/32.png) [@lkfken](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/lkfken)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2006, 12:02am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-1-1-hosed-my-apache/56404/2 "2006-03-31T00:02:51Z")

</div>

Kenneth L. wrote:

> …  
> However, the sites that were working fine on 1.0 suddenly broke, and  
> started spewing FCGI errors. Of course, I’m lazy and I didn’t check  
> them right away. Serves me right.
> 
> So I woke up this morning to find that my apache has died. FCGI  
> errors from apache filled all the logs as my sites were spidered by  
> Google. Ooops.
> 
> For some reason I was under the mistaken impression that 1.0 -\> 1.1  
> should not have been a problem.

I love rails 1.1 but I think if a rails 1.1.1 isn’t released soon with  
~8-12 key bugfixes, rails may–undeservedly–gain a reputation for being  
a ‘hobby’ framework that is too unreliable & risky for commercial  
websites.

Also, many people have a vested interest in preventing migrations to  
rails (from Java, PHP, ASP, etc.) and may use this to spread FUD. With  
all the time/money they already have invested, it won’t be long before  
you see articles about rails being “too unreliable and risky”.

I think the best we can do as rails users is to avoid pissing off the  
core team with insults and help them with useful bug reports or patches.

I sincerely hope rails 1.1.1 will be released to address the top ~10  
bugs before substantial new features are added–I especially hope the  
bugfixes will be focused on issues that cause problems during upgrades  
from 1.0 -\> 1.1…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lkfken](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/7bcc69/32.png) [@lkfken](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/lkfken)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2006, 12:14am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-1-1-hosed-my-apache/56404/3 "2006-03-31T00:14:16Z")

</div>

I hope I didn’t come off as sounding like I was bitching/ranting. I  
was just noting that my older rails apps blew up badly while the ones  
running from the edge went just fine.

Someone should put up/update the wiki with Rails 1.0 -\> 1.1 gotchas  
and resolutions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lkfken](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/7bcc69/32.png) [@lkfken](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/lkfken)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2006, 12:17am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/rails-1-1-hosed-my-apache/56404/4 "2006-03-31T00:17:23Z")

</div>

1.1 release is not a bugfix release for 1.0. It’s more like 2.0 release.  
And  
in my practise, I don’t remember a single x.0 release that didn’t have  
some  
critical issues. That’s why I’m still waiting for MacBook Pro rev2.
