# Problem with http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ru

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/problem-with-http-blade-nagaokaut-ac-jp-cgi-bin-scat-rb-ru/97508>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [July 7, 2006, 3:32pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/problem-with-http-blade-nagaokaut-ac-jp-cgi-bin-scat-rb-ru/97508 "2006-07-07T15:32:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sean](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/f0a364/32.png) [@sean](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/sean)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2006, 3:32pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/problem-with-http-blade-nagaokaut-ac-jp-cgi-bin-scat-rb-ru/97508/1 "2006-07-07T15:32:39Z")

</div>

Hi,

There seems to be a problem with the web interface to ruby-talk at  
[http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/](http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/).

For example,  
[http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/1](http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/1)  
returns an email from Robert K. dated 15 Dec 2005 and not Matz’s  
announcement of the list.

Has anyone else noticed this and are there plans to fix it?

Regards,  
Sean

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sean](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/f0a364/32.png) [@sean](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/sean)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2006, 6:10pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/problem-with-http-blade-nagaokaut-ac-jp-cgi-bin-scat-rb-ru/97508/2 "2006-07-07T18:10:35Z")

</div>

On 7/7/06, Sean O’Halpin [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> There seems to be a problem with the web interface to ruby-talk at  
> [http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/](http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/).
> 
> For example, [http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/1](http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/1)  
> returns an email from Robert K. dated 15 Dec 2005 and not Matz’s  
> announcement of the list.
> 
> Has anyone else noticed this and are there plans to fix it?

See the discussion here:

[http://www.codecomments.com/archive327-2005-12-733877.html](http://www.codecomments.com/archive327-2005-12-733877.html)

Forgive the link to an ugly, ad-heavy site, but it was the only source  
I could find that had most of the conversation pulled together. Both  
blade and google groups have the threading for that period  
understandably mixed up. You can also read here:

[http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse\_frm/thread/104543856edfdd53/0b53da70fb67a86f?tvc=1#0b53da70fb67a86f](http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse_frm/thread/104543856edfdd53/0b53da70fb67a86f?tvc=1#0b53da70fb67a86f)

for a little more of the story. The first part of that thread is a  
separate discussion; as I mentioned, google groups got the threads  
mixed up. Start at message “7” in that link.

Anyways, it was due to a glitch in the mailing list that overwrote  
some of the older messages in the archive. Wayne V. seems to  
have, or at least had, backups of those messages, but it appears no  
one’s done the restore yet.

Jacob F.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sean](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/f0a364/32.png) [@sean](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/sean)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2006, 7:04pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/problem-with-http-blade-nagaokaut-ac-jp-cgi-bin-scat-rb-ru/97508/3 "2006-07-07T19:04:10Z")

</div>

On 7/7/06, Jacob F. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> See the discussion here:  
> for a little more of the story. The first part of that thread is a  
> separate discussion; as I mentioned, google groups got the threads  
> mixed up. Start at message “7” in that link.
> 
> Anyways, it was due to a glitch in the mailing list that overwrote  
> some of the older messages in the archive. Wayne V. seems to  
> have, or at least had, backups of those messages, but it appears no  
> one’s done the restore yet.
> 
> Jacob F.

Thanks for the info. It would indeed be a shame if they were lost.

Regards,  
Sean