# Please put the death nail in #type

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-put-the-death-nail-in-type/97958>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [July 11, 2006, 5:29pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-put-the-death-nail-in-type/97958 "2006-07-11T17:29:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/4bbf92/32.png) [@unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/unknown)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2006, 5:29pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-put-the-death-nail-in-type/97958/1 "2006-07-11T17:29:14Z")

</div>

Mind if we finally do away with #type altogether now? The warning is  
getting old --I mean like granny old.

T.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/4bbf92/32.png) [@unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/unknown)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2006, 5:52pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-put-the-death-nail-in-type/97958/2 "2006-07-11T17:52:36Z")

</div>

Hi –

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid wrote:

> Mind if we finally do away with #type altogether now? The warning is  
> getting old --I mean like granny old.

I agree. ‘proc’ likewise.

David