# Please Break This: 0.5.1 RC1 **URL:** \ **Category:** Radiant CMS\ **Created:** [August 3, 2006, 2:23pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174 "2006-08-03T14:23:33Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 17\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2006, 2:23pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/1 "2006-08-03T14:23:33Z")
Just announced this on the blog: [http://radiantcms.org/blog/2006/08/03/please-break-this-radiant-0-5-1-rc1/](http://radiantcms.org/blog/2006/08/03/please-break-this-radiant-0-5-1-rc1/) * * * It?s been a bit quiet on the home front since the release of 0.5, but that doesn?t mean that we haven?t been busy. Without further ado, I present 0.5.1 release candidate 1: [http://radiantcms.org/downloads/radiant-0.5.1-rc1.gem](http://radiantcms.org/downloads/radiant-0.5.1-rc1.gem) Why a release candidate? Mainly because this version included major changes to the radiant command to allow users to upgrade existing installs. I?d like for people to test it pretty thoroughly before we release it into the wild. To get started install the release candidate gem like this: % gem install radiant-0.5.1-rc1.gem Then cd to the directory where you have installed radiant and execute this: % radiant --upgrade . Which should output something like this: Upgrading Radiant to version 0.5.1… Would you like to create backups of files that Radiant replaces? [yN]n overwrote ./CHANGELOG overwrote ./CONTRIBUTORS created ./public/.htaccess created ./public/images/layout.png overwrote ./public/images/new-layout.png created ./script/console created ./script/version updated Rails version to 1.1.4 in config/environment.rb updated Radiant version to 0.5.1 in config/instance.yml Done. Be sure to back up your install before upgrading. You can use the radiant command to upgrade radiant applications that are running in either instance mode or application mode. Bug reports aren?t much good after an official release, so please: try and break something! Apart from upgrade support, this version of Radiant includes the following enhancements: - The .htaccess file is now included in the public directory (this should make Apache users happy) - Migrations are now repaired so that you can run `rake migrate` to create the initial database. (However, `script/setup_database` is still the recommended method.) (closes ticket #46) [Daniel Shepherd] - When you collapse a branch in the admin page tree view and move to another tab the collapsed status is now saved so that when you return, the collapsed status is preserved. Also the status of collapsed branches is preserved when collapsing and expanding parent nodes. (closes ticket #29) [Daniel Shepherd] A few additional patches may make it into this release, so please, if you have a patch that you would like to see applied, speak up! – John L. [http://wiseheartdesign.com](http://wiseheartdesign.com) ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2006, 2:23pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/2 "2006-08-03T14:23:40Z")
On 03/08/2006, at 12:49 PM, John W. Long wrote: > Just announced this on the blog: > > [http://radiantcms.org/blog/2006/08/03/please-break-this-radiant-0-5-1-](http://radiantcms.org/blog/2006/08/03/please-break-this-radiant-0-5-1-) > rc1/ John, well done! once again, thanks for releasing radiant for us all! > Bug reports aren?t much good after an official release, so please: try > and break something! The admin interface is still broken when you use option 1 (Empty) from script/setup\_database. I’ll file a ticket with a patch in a second, just fixing it now. Bodhi ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2006, 2:23pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/3 "2006-08-03T14:23:42Z")
1. After upgradint to radiant 0.5.1. I got a “failed to update Rails version to 1.1.4 in config/environment.rb” message when updating an existing radiant instance. Is it harmful at all or just a warning? electronicbusiness radiant # radiant --upgrade . Upgrading Radiant to version 0.5.1… Would you like to create backups of files that Radiant replaces? [yN] y overwrote ./CHANGELOG backup CONTRIBUTORS? [Yn] y backed up CONTRIBUTORS as CONTRIBUTORS.20060803.bak overwrote ./CONTRIBUTORS created ./public/.htaccess created ./public/images/layout.png backup public/images/new-layout.png? [Yn] y backed up public/images/new-layout.png as new-layout.png.20060803.bak overwrote ./public/images/new-layout.png created ./script/console created ./script/version > failed to update Rails version to 1.1.4 in config/environment.rb > you may need to do this yourself > updated Radiant version to 0.5.1 in config/instance.yml > Done. 1. I issued again an update command on the same place I did before and I got the following “Cannot detect that Radiant is installed in this directory!” (below also an “ll” command of the instance directory): electronicbusiness radiant # radiant --upgrade . /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/radiant-0.5.1/bin/radiant:35: command not found: ./script/version Cannot detect that Radiant is installed in this directory! electronicbusiness radiant # ll total 52 drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Jul 12 20:49 cache -rw-r–r-- 1 root root 641 Aug 3 12:03 CHANGELOG drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jun 26 23:12 config -rw-r–r-- 1 root root 257 Aug 3 12:03 CONTRIBUTORS -rw-r–r-- 1 root root 214 Aug 3 12:03 CONTRIBUTORS.20060803.bak drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 23 19:13 db -rw-r–r-- 1 root root 1072 Jun 26 23:12 LICENSE drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 8 21:17 log drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 26 23:09 plugins drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Aug 3 12:03 public -rw-r–r-- 1 root root 2441 Jun 26 23:12 README drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Aug 3 12:03 script drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jun 26 23:09 vendor –M ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2006, 2:24pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/4 "2006-08-03T14:24:43Z")
On 3-Aug-06, at 1:53 AM | Aug 3, bodhi wrote: > The admin interface is still broken when you use option 1 (Empty) from > script/setup\_database. I’ll file a ticket with a patch in a second, > just fixing it now. An empty database doesn’t work for you even after applying the diff from ticket 195? (Thanks for adding the test to that, by the way.) James ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2006, 2:24pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/5 "2006-08-03T14:24:43Z")
On 03/08/2006, at 2:53 PM, bodhi wrote: > On 03/08/2006, at 12:49 PM, John W. Long wrote: > > > Bug reports aren?t much good after an official release, so please: try > > and break something! > > The admin interface is still broken when you use option 1 (Empty) from > script/setup\_database. I’ll file a ticket with a patch in a second, > just fixing it now. James MacAulay had already submitted a ticket/patch for it [1] so I just added my patch there, his patch fixes the bug too, I just included a test for it (and a fix as i found his patch after i made mine 🙂 ). Bodhi [1] [http://dev.radiantcms.org/radiant/ticket/195](http://dev.radiantcms.org/radiant/ticket/195) ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2006, 2:24pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/6 "2006-08-03T14:24:44Z")
On 3-Aug-06, at 2:04 AM | Aug 3, bodhi wrote: > James MacAulay had already submitted a ticket/patch for it [1] so I > just added my patch there, his patch fixes the bug too, I just > included > a test for it (and a fix as i found his patch after i made mine 🙂 ). Right, I was confused: I just noticed your test and didn’t notice the other fix you made. I like your fix better anyway 🙂 So is this issue because of today’s revision switching to Rails 1.1.4? Or has this bug been around since rev 84 and I haven’t noticed it? James ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2006, 2:24pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/7 "2006-08-03T14:24:45Z")
On 03/08/2006, at 3:20 PM, James MacAulay wrote: > So is this issue because of today’s revision switching to Rails > 1.1.4? Or has this bug been around since rev 84 and I haven’t noticed > it? I think this has been around since #84, as there are no other changes on page\_helper.rb since then… Bodhi ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2006, 3:15pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/8 "2006-08-03T15:15:56Z")
Maurizio B. wrote: > 1. I issued again an update command on the same place I did before and > I got the following “Cannot detect that Radiant is installed in this > directory!” (below also an “ll” command of the instance directory): > > electronicbusiness radiant # radiant --upgrade . > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/radiant-0.5.1/bin/radiant:35: command not > found: ./script/version > Cannot detect that Radiant is installed in this directory! Is ./script/version executable? This is probably the problem. – John L. [http://wiseheartdesign.com](http://wiseheartdesign.com) ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2006, 3:09pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/9 "2006-08-03T15:09:54Z")
Maurizio B. wrote: > overwrote ./CONTRIBUTORS > Done. > Please post your config/environment.rb. Radiant uses a simple regular > expression to substitute the gem version: if file\_sub(filename, /RAILS\_GEM\_VERSION\s\*=\s\*‘\d[.\d]+’/m, “RAILS\_GEM\_VERSION = ‘#{version}’”) See line 294 for the whole method: [http://dev.radiantcms.org/radiant/browser/trunk/radiant/bin/radiant#L294](http://dev.radiantcms.org/radiant/browser/trunk/radiant/bin/radiant#L294) > 1. I issued again an update command on the same place I did before and > I got the following “Cannot detect that Radiant is installed in this > directory!” (below also an “ll” command of the instance directory): Mmmm. I’ll look into this. – John L. [http://wiseheartdesign.com](http://wiseheartdesign.com) ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 4, 2006, 5:19am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/10 "2006-08-04T05:19:41Z")
On 03/08/2006, at 12:49 PM, John W. Long wrote: > Bug reports aren?t much good after an official release, so please: try > and break something! In development mode, radiant.rb is reloaded everytime: 192.168.1.21 - [Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:09:08 GMT] “POST /admin/ui/pages/children/1 HTTP/1.1” /Sites/radiant-patch/config/…/lib/radiant.rb:5: warning: already initialized constant Major /Sites/radiant-patch/config/…/lib/radiant.rb:6: warning: already initialized constant Minor /Sites/radiant-patch/config/…/lib/radiant.rb:7: warning: already initialized constant Tiny 192.168.1.21 - [Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:09:12 GMT] “GET /admin/pages HTTP/1.1” /Sites/radiant-patch/config/…/lib/radiant.rb:5: warning: already initialized constant Major /Sites/radiant-patch/config/…/lib/radiant.rb:6: warning: already initialized constant Minor /Sites/radiant-patch/config/…/lib/radiant.rb:7: warning: already initialized constant Tiny Not a big problem, but it is a bit annoying 🙂 Bodhi ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2006, 4:45am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/11 "2006-08-09T04:45:56Z")
bodhi wrote: > > The admin interface is still broken when you use option 1 (Empty) from > > script/setup\_database. I’ll file a ticket with a patch in a second, > > just fixing it now. > > James MacAulay had already submitted a ticket/patch for it [1] so I > just added my patch there, his patch fixes the bug too, I just included > a test for it (and a fix as i found his patch after i made mine 🙂 ). This is now fixed: [http://dev.radiantcms.org/radiant/ticket/195](http://dev.radiantcms.org/radiant/ticket/195) Thanks guys! – John L. [http://wiseheartdesign.com](http://wiseheartdesign.com) ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2006, 4:57am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/12 "2006-08-09T04:57:59Z")
bodhi wrote: > On 03/08/2006, at 12:49 PM, John W. Long wrote: > > > Bug reports aren?t much good after an official release, so please: try > > and break something! > > In development mode, radiant.rb is reloaded everytime: … Just committed a fix for this: [http://dev.radiantcms.org/radiant/changeset/94](http://dev.radiantcms.org/radiant/changeset/94) – John L. [http://wiseheartdesign.com](http://wiseheartdesign.com) ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2006, 7:16pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/13 "2006-08-03T19:16:37Z")
What work would it take, from me, to get the sort and re parent included in 5.1? ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2006, 5:52am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/14 "2006-08-09T05:52:05Z")
Erik B. Ordway wrote: > What work would it take, from me, to get the sort and re parent > included in 5.1? Mainly I need to have the time to review the patch. You and Bodhi have both been working on this. Which one is the proper patch? – John L. [http://wiseheartdesign.com](http://wiseheartdesign.com) ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2006, 6:43am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/15 "2006-08-09T06:43:12Z")
On 09/08/2006, at 12:49 PM, John W. Long wrote: > Erik B. Ordway wrote: > > > What work would it take, from me, to get the sort and re parent > > included in 5.1? > > Mainly I need to have the time to review the patch. You and Bodhi have > both been working on this. Which one is the proper patch? I haven’t kept up with Erik’s work, but I do know that my patch breaks the css layout on the snippets and layouts lists. Bodhi ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2006, 4:10pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/16 "2006-08-09T16:10:47Z")
I’ll take a look but bodhi’s interface changes even if there are fixes needed for snippets and layout (although I am using it and see no issues) is the way to go for the sorting of children in a parent. I have added on to his work to add re-parenting up and down and posted that as an enhanced version of his patch. It is much less invasive than my orignal patch and with his change to lists and spans much cleaner. ---
**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2006, 2:25pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/please-break-this-0-5-1-rc1/101174/17 "2006-08-09T14:25:35Z")
bodhi wrote: > > > What work would it take, from me, to get the sort and re parent > > > included in 5.1? > > > Mainly I need to have the time to review the patch. You and Bodhi have > > both been working on this. Which one is the proper patch? > > I haven’t kept up with Erik’s work, but I do know that my patch breaks > the css layout on the snippets and layouts lists. Ok, I’ll need a complete patch before I can consider it for inclusion in the core. Also, briefly looking over your patch, there were some changes made last night that probably make your patch incompatible with whats in trunk. If you can make sure that your patch is ready to go it will certainly make things easier if I get to the point of being ready to apply it. – John L. [http://wiseheartdesign.com](http://wiseheartdesign.com)