# Performance metrics

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/performance-metrics/151040>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [October 16, 2008, 8:36am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/performance-metrics/151040 "2008-10-16T08:36:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![barjunk](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/3ec8ea/32.png) [@barjunk](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/barjunk)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 8:36am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/performance-metrics/151040/1 "2008-10-16T08:36:03Z")

</div>

Someone that likes perl showed this to me the other day.

[http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=ruby&lang2=perl](http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=ruby&lang2=perl)

This seems awfully suspicious to me…but I haven’t a real clue if  
these are reasonable benchmark tests.

Mike B.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![barjunk](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/3ec8ea/32.png) [@barjunk](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/barjunk)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2008, 1:48pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/performance-metrics/151040/2 "2008-10-16T13:48:02Z")

</div>

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 08:34, barjunk [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> Someone that likes perl showed this to me the other day.
> 
> [http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=ruby&lang2=perl](http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=ruby&lang2=perl)
> 
> This seems awfully suspicious to me…but I haven’t a real clue if  
> these are reasonable benchmark tests.

Search the archive ([ruby-talk shootout - Google Search](http://www.google.sk/search?q=ruby-talk+shootout)).  
It has been discussed dozen times.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![barjunk](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/3ec8ea/32.png) [@barjunk](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/barjunk)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2008, 12:50am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/performance-metrics/151040/3 "2008-10-17T00:50:40Z")

</div>

On Oct 16, 3:45 am, Jano S. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 08:34, barjunk [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:
> 
> > Someone that likes perl showed this to me the other day.
> 
> > [http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=allâŒ©=rub](http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all%C3%A2%C5%92%C2%A9=rub)…
> 
> > This seems awfully suspicious to me…but I haven’t a real clue if  
> > these are reasonable benchmark tests.
> 
> Search the archive ([ruby-talk shootout - Google Search](http://www.google.sk/search?q=ruby-talk+shootout)).  
> It has been discussed dozen times.

Thanks for the link.

So then the data is accurate. OK. I don’t use Ruby because its the  
fastest and most memory efficient anyway.

Mike B.
