# Patches

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patches/96599>\
**Category:** Radiant CMS\
**Created:** [June 30, 2006, 3:08am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patches/96599 "2006-06-30T03:08:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2006, 3:08am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patches/96599/1 "2006-06-30T03:08:51Z")

</div>

Today, while cleaning up after the release last night, I discovered a  
couple of tickets which had patches on them that I had overlooked. I  
haven’t figured out away to subscribe to all of the changes on Trac yet,  
but I did want to give people the opportunity to bring up changes which  
they have worked on that have not been applied to the core yet.

Have I overlooked anyone else? Is there something that you’ve worked  
hard on which would be generally useful to the community, but hasn’t  
been applied yet?

Let me know.

–  
John L.  
[http://wiseheartdesign.com](http://wiseheartdesign.com)  
[http://radiantcms.org](http://radiantcms.org)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2006, 8:31am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patches/96599/2 "2006-06-30T08:31:14Z")

</div>

There is a newer version of my tagging patch against r78 now on there in  
case it was missed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2006, 3:12pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patches/96599/3 "2006-06-30T15:12:18Z")

</div>

Andrew Montgomery wrote:

> There is a newer version of my tagging patch against r78 now on there in  
> case it was missed.

I did notice that. I haven’t had a chance to look at it again, but was  
excited to see that it did implement the features we had talked about.

Do you feel it’s ready for the core?

–  
John L.  
[http://wiseheartdesign.com](http://wiseheartdesign.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/34f0e0/32.png) [@John\_WSLong](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/John_WSLong)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2006, 3:33pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patches/96599/4 "2006-06-30T15:33:59Z")

</div>

On 30/6/2006, “John W. Long” [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> Andrew Montgomery wrote:
> 
> > There is a newer version of my tagging patch against r78 now on there in  
> > case it was missed.
> 
> I did notice that. I haven’t had a chance to look at it again, but was  
> excited to see that it did implement the features we had talked about.
> 
> Do you feel it’s ready for the core?

I don’t really want to make that call.

I’d like to try and find a way to get the behaviours to use the default  
\<r:link /\> tag instead of defining my own one, but I haven’t worked out  
how to do that yet since I’m not quite sure how to define where the  
output of tag.render\_url (thats right isn’t it?) comes from, so I can  
override the value.

However, I’m happy for it to be merged in now if no-one has any issues  
with it.