# Patch to compile under ruby 1.9 (svn) **URL:** \ **Category:** Ruby-Gnome 2\ **Created:** [October 26, 2008, 6:38pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patch-to-compile-under-ruby-1-9-svn/151837 "2008-10-26T18:38:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Carlo\_ESPrelz](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/f07891/32.png) [@Carlo\_ESPrelz](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Carlo_ESPrelz)\ **Post date:** [October 26, 2008, 6:38pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patch-to-compile-under-ruby-1-9-svn/151837/1 "2008-10-26T18:38:14Z")
Below you can find the patch to current svn that needs to be applied to compile under ruby 1.9 (current svn). The only stuff that needed to be changed (but many, many times…) is from RARRAY(xxx)-\>len to RARRAY\_LEN(xxx) and from RARRAY(xxx)-\>ptr to RARRAY\_PTR(xxx) The whole tree compiles, but I only use GTK (and a relatively small part of it). Thus, no warranty… Carlo ---
**Author:** ![Carlo\_ESPrelz](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/f07891/32.png) [@Carlo\_ESPrelz](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Carlo_ESPrelz)\ **Post date:** [December 9, 2008, 12:29pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patch-to-compile-under-ruby-1-9-svn/151837/2 "2008-12-09T12:29:07Z")
Hi, In [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) “[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Patch to compile under ruby 1.9 (svn)” on Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:57:23 +0100, “Carlo E. Prelz” [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > and from > > RARRAY(xxx)-\>ptr > to > RARRAY\_PTR(xxx) > > The whole tree compiles, but I only use GTK (and a relatively small > part of it). Thus, no warranty… I’m sorry for my late response. I did the same work a month ago. I know that there are many other problems to work with Ruby 1.9 but I have time for now… ## Thanks, kou ---
**Author:** ![Carlo\_ESPrelz](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/f07891/32.png) [@Carlo\_ESPrelz](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Carlo_ESPrelz)\ **Post date:** [December 10, 2008, 10:58am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patch-to-compile-under-ruby-1-9-svn/151837/3 "2008-12-10T10:58:29Z")
Subject: Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Patch to compile under ruby 1.9 (svn) Date: mar 09 dic 08 08:28:24 +0900 Quoting Kouhei S. (removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid): > I’m sorry for my late response. I did the same work a month ago. > I know that there are many other problems to work with Ruby > 1.9 but I have time for now… No problem of course. There were a few other things in my patch, that are still not corrected in the SVN tree: 1. the rubysig.h include file now gives a warning if inserted : warning: #warning rubysig.h is obsolete (in rbgtk.h, rbgobj\_type.c) 1. rb\_thread\_critical seems not to exist anymore. It is referred to in rbgobj\_type.c. I have included this line: static VALUE rb\_thread\_critical=Qfalse; which seems to work, but I have no idea if this is the right way to solve the problem. 1. rb\_progname seems not to exist anymore. It is referred to in rbgtkmain.c. I have no idea about how exactly to solve this issue, too. What I did is to modify line EXTERN VALUE rb\_progname; to VALUE rb\_progname=Qnil; (around the beginning), and then, before rb\_progname is used, I added these lines if(rb\_progname==Qnil) rb\_progname=rb\_gv\_get("$PROGRAM\_NAME"); You will certainly know what is the right patch to apply 😉 > Thanks, Thanks to you! Carlo – - ``` Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da ``` parte, - K \* Carlo E. Prelz - removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid che bisogno ci sarebbe - ``` di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? ``` (Chuang-Tzu) ---
**Author:** ![Carlo\_ESPrelz](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/f07891/32.png) [@Carlo\_ESPrelz](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Carlo_ESPrelz)\ **Post date:** [December 10, 2008, 1:25pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/patch-to-compile-under-ruby-1-9-svn/151837/4 "2008-12-10T13:25:41Z")
Hi, In [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) “Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Patch to compile under ruby 1.9 (svn)” on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:18:12 +0100, “Carlo E. Prelz” [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > Subject: Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Patch to compile under ruby 1.9 (svn) > Date: mar 09 dic 08 08:28:24 +0900 > > Quoting Kouhei S. (removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid): > > > I’m sorry for my late response. I did the same work a month ago. > > I know that there are many other problems to work with Ruby > > 1.9 but I have time for now… Oops… I wanted to say “I don’t have time for now…”. :\< > There were a few other things in my patch, that are still not > corrected in the SVN tree: > > 1. the rubysig.h include file now gives a warning if inserted : > > warning: #warning rubysig.h is obsolete > > (in rbgtk.h, rbgobj\_type.c) done. > 1. rb\_thread\_critical seems not to exist anymore. It is referred to in > rbgobj\_type.c. I have included this line: > > static VALUE rb\_thread\_critical=Qfalse; > > which seems to work, but I have no idea if this is the right way to > solve the problem. done. > (around the beginning), and then, before rb\_progname is used, I added > these lines > > if(rb\_progname==Qnil) > rb\_progname=rb\_gv\_get(“$PROGRAM\_NAME”); We should use rb\_argv0 instead of rb\_progname. ## Thanks, kou