# Non-creative POSTs with REST **URL:** \ **Category:** Rails\ **Created:** [January 26, 2007, 10:40pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/non-creative-posts-with-rest/83525 "2007-01-26T22:40:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/258eb7/32.png) [@Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ed_Hickey)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2007, 10:40pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/non-creative-posts-with-rest/83525/1 "2007-01-26T22:40:14Z")
I have a view with data that needs to be sorted and/or filtered. Previously, I had a form that would POST the filters or sorting commnds to the page. This breaks in REST because the auto-created routes tell rails I want to create a new record. For instance, map.resources :assets creates this route: POST /assets/ {:controller=\>“assets”, :action=\>“create”} but, of course, posting the filter-form to that location invokes the create action when I really just want to invoke the index action. I came up with this, but it seems a bit dodgy: map.assets\_stats ‘/assets/stats’, :controller =\> “assets”, :action =\> “index” If I have 10 controllers that all need this functionality, it becomes fairly un-DRY… Is the only solution to change my forms to GET instead of POST? Got to be a better way… Thanks, Ed ---
**Author:** ![Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/258eb7/32.png) [@Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ed_Hickey)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2007, 10:45pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/non-creative-posts-with-rest/83525/2 "2007-01-26T22:45:15Z")
On 1/26/07, Ed Hickey [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > this, but it seems a bit dodgy: > Thanks, > Ed > > > Ed, Just add a sort action: map.resources :assets, :collection =\> { :sort =\> :post } Hope this helps. – Zack C. [http://depixelate.com](http://depixelate.com) ---
**Author:** ![Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/258eb7/32.png) [@Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ed_Hickey)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2007, 10:51pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/non-creative-posts-with-rest/83525/3 "2007-01-26T22:51:16Z")
> map.resources :assets, :collection =\> { :sort =\> :post } With a little creativity, or Jamis B.'s blog in your feed reader [1], you can bust off some with\_options action: map.with\_options :collection =\> { :sort =\> :post } do |sortable\_map| sortable\_map.resources :assets sortable\_map.resources :articles end Course, that may break down if some of your resources modify :collection on their own. Another option if you have a bunch of identical resources is to do this: map.resources :assets, :articles, :collection =\> { :sort =\> :post } 1. [Buckblog: Object#with\_options](http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2007/1/24/object-with_options) – Rick O. [http://weblog.techno-weenie.net](http://weblog.techno-weenie.net) [http://mephistoblog.com](http://mephistoblog.com) ---
**Author:** ![Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/258eb7/32.png) [@Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ed_Hickey)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2007, 11:05pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/non-creative-posts-with-rest/83525/4 "2007-01-26T23:05:18Z")
Should have mentioned that I did try that approach (using :collection) but this is what gave me: POST /assets;sort/ {:controller=\>“assets”, :action=\>“sort”} I want the action to be “index”, not “sort” because the data is all displayed in the index view. I want to POST to the index view without rails routing me to the create action. ed On 1/26/07, Rick O. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > end > Rick O. > [http://weblog.techno-weenie.net](http://weblog.techno-weenie.net) > [http://mephistoblog.com](http://mephistoblog.com) > > > – Ed Hickey Developer Litmus Media 816-533-0409 removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid A Member of Think Partnership, Inc [www.ThinkPartnership.com](http://www.ThinkPartnership.com) Amex ticker symbol: THK ---
**Author:** ![Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/258eb7/32.png) [@Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ed_Hickey)\ **Post date:** [January 27, 2007, 12:05am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/non-creative-posts-with-rest/83525/5 "2007-01-27T00:05:27Z")
On 1/26/07, Ed Hickey [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > I have a view with data that needs to be sorted and/or filtered. > Is the only solution to change my forms to GET instead of POST? Got to be a > better way… If you’re just sorting/filtering the data, I would think it makes a lot more sense for the request to be a GET. Why don’t you want to change it like that? Anyway, another option is to have some kind of Results or Query object. You POST to create on that object, and you could do whatever you want from there. Either just list the elements, save the query for later, etc. Pat ---
**Author:** ![Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/258eb7/32.png) [@Ed\_Hickey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ed_Hickey)\ **Post date:** [January 29, 2007, 6:45pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/non-creative-posts-with-rest/83525/6 "2007-01-29T18:45:47Z")
On 1/26/07, Pat M. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > change it like that? > I guess I don’t really, I was just adverse to cluttering up the URL with > all > the filtering variables 🙂 I changed them form method to GET and it > works > as needed now. Thanks for the help, everyone. – Ed